Question about magnetic induction

[TechStuf]

It is not by coincidence that current field models as taught at universities everywhere are archaically old and wrong.


There are myriad ways of causing magnetic fields to interact, even at near field, such that ample flux lattice vector changes occur with very little cost, system wise.


There are numerous pursuits that are much more productive at this time, than induction studies....as the really advanced Free energy is truly just above and around the corner.


'Theoretically' One may get a more realistic education regarding exotic energy/propulsion systems by pointing high powered hand held lasers at the hundreds (if not thousands) of Near Earth Orbiting objects masquerading as stars overhead at this time. (NOT to be confused with intra-atmospheric aircraft, BIG no no)


It's rather breathtaking to see them zoom down from orbit, covering a hundred miles or so in a split second to hover 100 feet above one's head, bathing the entire area in eerie metallic light, after being "painted".  Judging by the youtube videos, many are now waking up to the 'armada' parked in earth orbit.  Many are zipping about daily in the lower atmosphere as well.


http://kdvr.com/2012/11/08/mile-high-city-mystery-ufo-sightings-in-sky-over-denver/


There IS going to be an epic battle, and the "stars" WILL fall from heaven....


Just as foretold.

[Neo-X]

@TechStuf @Neo-X hmm, let's see, know what?
amuse me, do a case study. and when you're done( or if
ever) be assured that a
discussion about radial
magnetic field anomalies
would habe been actualy
interesting but of course not here on this forum for OU
professionals.My bad
God bless you

--End of Quote--

If theres is anomaly in your design, what is it? From what would I see, you are just wasting energy instead of gaining. The two coils are in opposing field so their magnetic field are just canceled out instead of combining. So their total magnetic field change is very little. Another thing is loop L is in center of the coil c1 & c2 where the change of magnetic field is weakest (there is a little change because of magnet m1 & m2) so the induce voltage in loop L is very small. Without magnet m1 & m2 the induce voltage in loop L is zero. I hope I made a clear answer to your question.

[Neo-X]

@TechStuf @Neo-X hmm, let's see, know what?
amuse me, do a case study. and when you're done( or if
ever) be assured that a
discussion about radial
magnetic field anomalies
would habe been actualy
interesting but of course not here on this forum for OU
professionals.My bad
God bless you

--End of Quote--

If theres is anomaly in your design, what is it? From what would I see, you are just wasting energy instead of gaining. The two coils are in opposing field so their magnetic field are just canceled out instead of combining. So their total magnetic field change is very little. Another thing is loop L is in center of the coil c1 & c2 where the change of magnetic field is weakest (there is a little change because of magnet m1 & m2) so the induce voltage in loop L is very small. Without magnet m1 & m2 the induce voltage in loop L is zero. I hope I made a clear answer to your question. Sorry for my bad english.

[hoptoad]

It is not by coincidence that current field models as taught at universities everywhere are archaically old and wrong.
snip...

Just exactly how do you know what is being taught now in universities everywhere? Are you omniscient? 

[TechStuf]

Just exactly how do you know what is being taught now in universities everywhere ? Are you omniscient?

Being as you possess internet search capability and I currently possess internet search capability....your first question is rather moot, even willfully ignorant.  As for the second, the answer is - Of course not. 


I do readily admit to being omnivorous, however.  Perhaps that is what you meant?


TS