My Current Build

[Bessler007]

Well, Alan Bauloree, I'll take you at your word that you'll stop trying to defend your indefensible position.

IMO, YOUR WORDS NO LONGER HAVE ANY CREDIBILITY. This may be the only response you will receive from me until you quit your bull $#!+ !!

You seem a bit confused but I don't mind lending a hand.  I won't quibble over your assessment of the words but they aren't mine.  They're yours.  You need to stop projecting your words and your personal attributes on me.

So you will need to build it with good precision, and then watch it go around, and around.     ...Alan Bauloree, Wed Oct 17, 2007 10:11 am @ besslerwheel

I understand it's not easy to man-up and admit you're a damn liar but you said you had no problem with that:

I am just human, and being human I make mistakes, but I will own up to them.

I'm very curious if your words have any meaning.  It doesn't appear they do but I'll give it some time before I reach a conclusion.  Have you ever owned up to that lie yet?  Would you like to man-up and do it here?

I don't like jumping to conclusions as it seems is your habit.  It also appears you're projecting your anger on me.

By the way, never mind Bessler007, he is still pissed off at Bessler Wheel for Banning him.

I'm not angry at all; just curious.  You do seem rather pissed though.  If you could do me a favor stop projecting your anger on me.  It reminds me of when you accused degreed physicists of being ignorant of physics on another forum.  Very silly.  Stop this silliness, Alan Bauloree.

I do have every intention of making the subtle point I spoke of earlier.




Bessler007
Cmdr, MIB

[BAHammer]

Sorry!! Due to your constant lying and deceiving, trying to play the grand inquisitor! Bessler007. As grayone said, your words no longer have any credibility.

IMO, YOUR WORDS NO LONGER HAVE ANY CREDIBILITY. This may be the only response you will receive from me until you quit your bull $#!+ !! 
When you start something more constructive like when I first use to talk to you, we can regroup and talk again.  Remember I was not your problem at Bessler Wheel and you started attacking me here on Over Unity. The evidence is clear, you where banned from there and I was not. I am still in good standings and respected. I am sure you have sneaked back in under a different name to spy. I would suspect, doe to some PMs I know who you are.

  Alan,
I'm not mad at Besslerwheel for banning me. How many times have you brought that up ? I haven't.
I have tried working on build ideas. And you always repeat yourself saying they won't work or using math is a bad idea. That does get old.
I did originally post that a self rolling wheel might not work, but might still be worth discussing.
an example is if a wheel is 1 meter in dimater. With 4kg's of weight in the center and if it's linear motion was 1 meter per second, the weight at the axle would have the value 4kg's times 1 meter per second. Using Newton's p=mv here.
If the 4kg's of weight is made to be 2-2kg weights and moved to the outside of the wheel, then their value is 4kg's times 3 meters per second. The outside of the wheel spins faster than it's linear movement.
This would give the same amount of weight about 3 times the momentum. This is why I think using flywheels is not a good idea. It seems they develop less force for the same amount of over balance.
I posted a drawing of this. The next step would be to use levers. And once again, by using math, a basis for a design can be configured as in the 2nd drawing. And the 3rd drawing shows the end result.
Mathematically, it will work very well. even if it only rotates at 5 or 10 rpm's. And that is more than any proven design has been capable of maintaining.
I've always found that being able to discuss things with people helps me to better understand this type of mechanics.
And of course, if the 3rd drawing works, it is something I think will support Bessler.

edited to modify pictures

[Bessler007]

Interesting idea, Jim.

I won't put all the elaboration into this subtle point I mentioned earlier as it seems there's something on the table for discussion now, yet the point should be made.

Alan Bauloree made this direct statement concerning copyrights:

I am not sure if you know this, but the C inside of the circle means registered copyright. If it is not properly registered you need to remove the circle. If I am not mistaken.

. . . in a very authoritative manner.  What motivates someone to police others making sure they dot their t's and cross their i's? 

After researching the matter and settling for a wiki answer as opposed to one from uspto, he crawfished his position with this nonsense:

I knew you wouldn't check it out, and for those who would like to know about the copyright emblem question. Here is the link. I was partly mistaken. When I have a question, I look it up.

Didn't sound like a question initially.

What motivates someone to suggest another put the art of their craft in a public forum unprotected?  I can only think of 2 reasons:

1.  Ignorance
2.  Desire to cannibalize other people's intellectual property

I won't pretend to know what Alan Bauloree's motivation was or that I've listed all possibilities.  I will forward this to the psychological department of MIB to see what conclusion they come to.

Again, interesting idea Jim.


Bessler007
Cmdr, MIB

[AB Hammer]

Bessler007

IMO, YOUR WORDS NO LONGER HAVE ANY CREDIBILITY.


BAHammer/Jim

You stated >>You (I) always repeat yourself (myself) saying they won't work or using math is a bad idea. That does get old.<<

If I was saying just that, you wold be correct. But that is not what I have been saying. Using "ONLY" math is a bad idea in this game, for math has never solved it. There are other factors that have to be understood and then the math can be corrected. Now for they won't work statement, this is due to I may have already tried it or something similar, not to mention physical experience tells you allot.

I hope this will at least clear up that idea. I had said you had posted the best I have seen "YOU" post. Understand. I never said that they would work, nor do I have need for others ideas, I have enough already. I offer help openly which is clear from my post if you pay attention. If someone else gets the wheel before me I will congratulate them. I will just try to design a better one for only the most powerful one will survive the competition cumming. Just a little insight to the future.

[Bessler007]

This just back from PsyDpt of MIB.

ANALYSIS:  Subject is having s e x with acorns.

They're your words, not mine.




Bessler007
Cmdr, MIB