Leedskalnin

[ramset]

quarktoo
quote:
Not sure what you mean by tapping. Do you mean striking the wire against the core with the core itself in the circuit during starting?
-----------------------------------------------

Yes, that is what I mean,why the "striking" for so long [10 min].?
What do you feel that is doing??

Chet

[quarktoo]

It is hit and miss on getting the spin curl wave in motion.

[ramset]

What kind of environment does it take to attempt to make
a spin curl wave?
Where could I study about this "spin Curl wave".

Could a mental midget such as myself even understand this?

Chet
PS
How are you even writing just one sentence responces?
Isn't that painful?

[markdansie]

your should read this before getting too excited
http://www.rexresearch.com/hubbard/hubbard.htm

[quarktoo]

your should read this before getting too excited
http://www.rexresearch.com/hubbard/hubbard.htm

I have read all that from lots of different sites over the years. Why would that keep a person from getting excited? Because of the radium claim?

There are lots of people that suspect the radium claim is false. Marinov proved that energy could be tapped without it.

Here is a quote from a patent that could get you excited again if you want to get past the disinfo. and explore the possibility of a polarized spin curl wave.


http://www.wipo.int/pctdb/en/wo.jsp?wo=2007103020&IA=WO2007103020&DISPLAY=DESC

"Newspaper photos (Anon. 1920a) of a more impressive demonstration of Hubbard's fuelless generator show a device described as 14 inches (36 cm) long and 1 1 inches (28 cm) in diameter connected by four heavy electrical cables to a 35-horsepower (26 kW) electric motor. The motor reportedly propelled an 18-foot open launch around a lake at a speed of 8 to 10 knots (Anon. 1920b). The event was witnessed by a cautious news reporter who claims to have checked thoroughly for any wires that might have been connected to hidden batteries by lifting the device and motor from the boat. Radioactive-decay energy can be eliminated as the main power source because about 108 times more radium than the entire

world's supply would have been needed to equal Hubbard's reported electric energy output of 330 amperes and 124 volts.

Lester J. Hendershot of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, reportedly demonstrated a fuelless generator in 1928 that was claimed by Hubbard to be a copy of his own device (1928h). The president of Stout Air Services, William B. Stout, who also designed the Ford Trimotor airplane, reported (1928b): "The demonstration was very impressive. It was actually uncanny . . . . The small model appeared to operate exactly as Hendershot explained it did." Also reportedly attesting to the operability of Hendershot's fuelless generator were Colonel Charles A. Lindbergh and Major Thomas Lanphier of the U.S. Air Corps (1928a, et seg.), and Lanphier's troops reportedly assembled a working model of the device.

To the Applicant's best knowledge, the only depiction that was made public of the interior components of any of these reported generators consists of a sketchy drawing (Bermann 1928h) of Hubbard's apparatus similar in size to the device shown in his 1919 demonstration. It depicts a complex set of parallel coils measuring 6 inches (15 cm) in length and 4.5 inches (1 1.4 cm) overall in diameter. Four leads of insulated wire with the insulation peeled back are shown coming out of the end of the device. What those four wires were connected to internally was not shown. Hubbard's description of the internal arrangement of coils in the device generally matches the drawing (Anon. 1920a): "It is made up of a group of eight electro-magnets, each with primary and secondary windings of copper wire, which are arranged around a large steel core. The core likewise has a single winding. About the entire group of cells is a secondary winding." Nothing was reported or depicted about how components functioned with each other, or how much radium was used and where the radium was positioned. The only connectors visible on the drawing were between the outer windings of the eight electromagnet coils. Theses connectors show that the direction of the windings alternated between clockwise and counterclockwise on adjacent coils, so that the polarity of each electromagnet would have been opposite to that of its adjacent neighbors.

If the Hubbard and Hendershot devices actually operated as reported, they apparently never attained acceptance or commercial success. Assuming the devices actually worked, their lack of success may have largely been financially based or supply-based, or both, compounded with skepticism from believers in the universal energy-conservation doctrine. How much radium was employed by Hubbard in his larger generator can only be guessed at, but assuming a typical laboratory radium needle containing 10 milligrams of radium was used, this amount would have cost $900 in 1920, dropping to $500 in 1929."