Stanley Meyer Explained

[Vortex 22]

This will be a direct replacement for most of what we use fossil fuels for now. So, yes we can cook our food, heat things, wield, and much much more as again with fossil fuels it's the hydrogen we are actually making use of and this technology gives us the hydrogen we need from a different source, IE, just natural water. It's the most transformative technology that I have ever come across. It's hard for most folks to imagine this technology replacing everywhere we use fossil fuels for when it comes to transportation, power generation, and more as it just seems too large for a small technology to be able to accomplish such a great change in the way we do things.


Hydrogen already runs the world as nothing that I know of would be alive today without hydrogen.


Shalom,
Edward Mitchell
CEO and Owner
True Green Solutions
https://www.gofundme.com/f/77uvw4-energy-independence-for-you-and-me

Hi Edward,
It's nice to hear from you
Thank you
God Bless You

[Vortex 22]

This is from an expert on the subject

YOU WANT THE WATER FUEL TO BURN SLOWLY ?
He is speaking of hydrogen or HHO gaz ?

Thanks

[h20power]

In order to control the burn rate of hydrogen all that is done is to add in gases that do not support the burning process. A good analogy of this is say you drive on the highway from one city to the other and time yourself. The first drive there is no traffic and you note the time it took you and upon coming back there is a traffic jam and again you note the time it took you. The trip with no traffic will be a lot faster than the trip with heavy traffic, correct? But why? It's because all of those cars physically got in your way on the return trip. This is what adding gases that do not support the combustion process does as they physically get in the way of the hydrogen and oxygen gases from being able to come together quickly.


With stove top burners Meyer redirected the flame front to go back in on itself, on cars he used the spent exhaust gases to add in gases that do not support the combustion process back into the mixture by way of the Exhaust Gas Recirculation (EGR) system with an electronically controlled metering value. This question seems as if it comes from one of my enemies that think I don't understand this technology like Tony Quinn. Trust me he is no expert as he has never moved to perform any real world experiments and thus hasn't learned anything as a result. To me he is a person that just loves the sound of their own voice as to come at this technology from a non-scientific perspective, IE, not making use of the scientific method will leave one lost and confused. When I started working to understand this technology I did so bringing science along with me actually making use of the scientific method. This method requires one to perform countless experiments as it's a slow process of elimination that gets at the truth of just how this technology works.


Most of people that come up against me don't like to make use of the scientific method as that forces them to perform experiments which in turn cost a lot of money. With this method anything you find that you are missing must be attained no mater what it is that is missing. Say if you find yourself not understanding scientific concepts all that well, then this method requires you to go to college too pick up the missing information and then you can get back to experimenting. Or, if you require a tool like a Differential Probe you can't move forwards until you get that measuring tool. People don't like this method as it leaves out nothing and thus does cost quite a bit of money and time to be spent in order to keep moving forwards with your experimentation on trying to understand this technology. I made use of the scientific method which is how I got to fully understand just what was actually going on. In doing so I was able to come up with a totally new theory that will one day be added to our books of science as those are the rewards of making use of the scientific method on something that is truly an unknown. This is why the way I now talk about this technology isn't talked about by others as simply put they don't know about these connections I have discovered about this technology when comparing it to how nature goes about breaking the bonds of the water molecules.


I moved this thread to a new spot so that I could raise the funding to be able to get this technology off the ground once I fully understood how the technology worked. I openly ask folks to donate to the cause so that this technology can get to phasing out the use of fossil fuels world wide in order to actually do something about our shared climate change problems. I move my thread because folks were complaining that I was trying to raise funds on this site. When it comes to our climate change problems we are all in the same boat together. In order to be effective this technology needs to go into mass production and for me to be able to do that I need the support of the people. If, like Meyer said, we all come together in one accord the world will have this technology. All I can do is hope folks move to support my efforts to bring this technology in by way of mass production so that the world can have it.


Shalom,
Edward Mitchell
CEO and Owner
True Green Solutions
https://www.gofundme.com/f/77uvw4-energy-independence-for-you-and-me

[Vortex 22]

In order to control the burn rate of hydrogen all that is done is to add in gases that do not support the burning process. A good analogy of this is say you drive on the highway from one city to the other and time yourself. The first drive there is no traffic and you note the time it took you and upon coming back there is a traffic jam and again you note the time it took you. The trip with no traffic will be a lot faster than the trip with heavy traffic, correct? But why? It's because all of those cars physically got in your way on the return trip. This is what adding gases that do not support the combustion process does as they physically get in the way of the hydrogen and oxygen gases from being able to come together quickly.


With stove top burners Meyer redirected the flame front to go back in on itself, on cars he used the spent exhaust gases to add in gases that do not support the combustion process back into the mixture by way of the Exhaust Gas Recirculation (EGR) system with an electronically controlled metering value. This question seems as if it comes from one of my enemies that think I don't understand this technology like Tony Quinn. Trust me he is no expert as he has never moved to perform any real world experiments and thus hasn't learned anything as a result. To me he is a person that just loves the sound of their own voice as to come at this technology from a non-scientific perspective, IE, not making use of the scientific method will leave one lost and confused. When I started working to understand this technology I did so bringing science along with me actually making use of the scientific method. This method requires one to perform countless experiments as it's a slow process of elimination that gets at the truth of just how this technology works.


Most of people that come up against me don't like to make use of the scientific method as that forces them to perform experiments which in turn cost a lot of money. With this method anything you find that you are missing must be attained no mater what it is that is missing. Say if you find yourself not understanding scientific concepts all that well, then this method requires you to go to college too pick up the missing information and then you can get back to experimenting. Or, if you require a tool like a Differential Probe you can't move forwards until you get that measuring tool. People don't like this method as it leaves out nothing and thus does cost quite a bit of money and time to be spent in order to keep moving forwards with your experimentation on trying to understand this technology. I made use of the scientific method which is how I got to fully understand just what was actually going on. In doing so I was able to come up with a totally new theory that will one day be added to our books of science as those are the rewards of making use of the scientific method on something that is truly an unknown. This is why the way I now talk about this technology isn't talked about by others as simply put they don't know about these connections I have discovered about this technology when comparing it to how nature goes about breaking the bonds of the water molecules.


I moved this thread to a new spot so that I could raise the funding to be able to get this technology off the ground once I fully understood how the technology worked. I openly ask folks to donate to the cause so that this technology can get to phasing out the use of fossil fuels world wide in order to actually do something about our shared climate change problems. When it comes to our climate change problems we are all in the same boat together. In order to be effective this technology needs to go into mass production and for me to be able to do that I need the support of the people. If, like Meyer said, we all come together in one accord the world will have this technology. All I can do is hope folks move to support my efforts to bring this technology in by way of mass production so that the world can have it.


Shalom,
Edward Mitchell
CEO and Owner
True Green Solutions
https://www.gofundme.com/f/77uvw4-energy-independence-for-you-and-me

Hi Edward,

It's nice to hear from you!!!

Thank you so much!!!
God Bless You

[massive]

Huh! I bumped this thread days ago. I dont know why anyone rips into Ed.  why not just let the guy do his thing?
 
Governments around the world are jointly motivated to remove ALL piston driven vehicles from the road.
People dont have a choice, even if they Believe they made the choice to buy an EV. all they did was buy yet another consumer item.
Electric vehicles are being forced on people. Do a search in your own country, Governments are crushing cars in record numbers.
just more divide and rule.

everyone was taught the basics of the ATOM , at school, yet everyone ditches the basics.
no one on these sites mentions the Free Electron

E-cars dont run on Batteries , they run on Free Electrons. People dont have to be held to ransom for Batteries for E-cars or the breakdown of water.
Ed has the pic/diagram representing a Lightning strike / circuit.  A free lesson by Nature on HV and Free electrons.