Stanley Meyer Explained

[h20power]

You see kolbacist here is the problem in a nutshell. If people like you are ask a question they never give an answer. I ask you what does the area under the curve represent and you gave no answer, why is that? You know what's even more sad, I think I posted the answer to that question only a page or two back. This is what I mean by being disrespectful as people like you will not even take the time to read what is posted in this thread but come at me as if you have all the answers when it should be clear that I am posting all of the answers as to the science behind this technology free for all to have and learn from.


Right now you need to go over this thread and pay attention to pages 21 & 23 as I go over the science behind this technology and you will find it interesting to lean that it has nothing to do with Dr. Faraday's work as it is something the scientific community missed in their rush to give answers to how thunderstorms actually work as they couldn't be more wrong. Mimicking this Global Electric Circuit electronically is exactly what Meyer, and others, did to break the bonds of the water molecules at rates that far exceed the efficiency of Dr. Faraday's electrolysis method.


This is not a miracle as it is science that has gone misunderstood for long enough in my book. This technology is the total opposite of classical electrochemistry according to Faraday's law as it is looking at how nature breaks the bonds of the water molecules and mimicking that. People like to go to what I call the comic book section of Meyer's patents and just look at the pictures but in that they get mislead as Meyer shows only one side of the waveform most of the time but if one reads the information in the adult section he always talks about there being both positive and negative voltages and as it would have it just a page back I go over the importance of the waveform having a balanced positive and negative voltage complete with photos and even a photo of my actual waveform from which those drawings are based off of. Yes, I did the work as that is what is required when making use of the scientific method.


Sure it took me a long time to get at the science behind this technology as I started this journey back in 2006 but I knew going into this that the scientific method is a slow process but I kept at it for over a decade. It's hard when you are dealing with unknowns as you have to ask and answer the right questions and will find that you don't have really anyplace to go and look up any information as most of what you are dealing with is new to the scientific community. In that it is something new to the scientific community you have to trust your experimental results and observations and constantly test them to make sure you are in fact correct. And while all of this is going on if you are like me and post in open places people will treat you with utter disdain and disrespect. I guess in their minds who do I think I am?! This is my experience with dealing with the Open Source community I get treated as garbage for my troubles.


Anyway, I am ranting thus it's time to stop posting for a bit.
Have a wonderful weekend everyone 

[kolbacict]

I also have a question why many people advise adding soda to the water, or worse, caustic soda.This negates the idea of high-voltage resonant decomposition of water.High voltage simply cannot exist in such a conductive medium.

[h20power]

I also have a question why many people advise adding soda to the water, or worse, caustic soda.This negates the idea of high-voltage resonant decomposition of water.High voltage simply cannot exist in such a conductive medium.

Sure you are correct in this as what works best for Faraday style water decomposition works worse for Meyer style water decomposition. But there is something you have to know about me in that if I ask you a question I expect an answer and now with each and every post that you make on my thread will be followed up by that question until I get an answer from you stating you truly don't know or this is what it represents in your own words. The reason being is this question drives at the core of how this technology works and if one can't interpret the readings on a oscilloscope what chance do they have at understanding this technology? This is where being honest actually helps as I will provide the answer but first I want my question answered.


"What does the area under the curve represent on a oscilloscope for this technology?"


I hate to do this to you but it is a very important question and thus must not go unanswered.


Just keeping it real,
Edward

[kolbacict]

If this is the current passed through the cell, then the area is the number of kulons passed in one or the other direction.

[Toolofcortex]

Ok, enough of this.

I have tracked down the necessary information to lay this subject to rest.

https://www.blogtalkradio.com/waterfuelmuseum/2007/03/25/stephen-meyer-part-1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=2&v=NTHxWpXI-WY

In this series, you will hear Stephen say that his system is more advanced and that nobody knew how Stans stuff worked

I have examined this patent, and it seems the circuit is complete.

I have here the necessary synthesizer of this waveform, and now all that is needed is self wound double tap audio transformers. The 3 phase winding is now possible, all the hard work, done by me. You are free to do whatever you want, a microcontroller with a lowpass might be simpler, depending on how comfortable you are.

I believe, the amplifier should be N type mosfet as they are reliable and cheap, I also believe, that for scientific experimentation, non commutation state must be maintained.

Read up on these and how to make them efficient.

The goal here is not to have 100% efficiency. Any heat-loss should be re-utilized for other purposes.

The ultimate goal is to determine if certain signals inflence the efficiency, and for this we need quality signals.

@ a certain frequency point, mechanical generator drop off in efficiency, now if the cell you build is static, its best to be able to reach higher frequencies.