Stanley Meyer Explained

[h20power]

but if I read Stanley Meyer's original patent US5149407, Page 19 (6), Line 10:
https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/d0/de/ef/9a5c1da561dabd/US5149407.pdf
Stanley Meyer patents this type of diode :
1N1198
"Power Rectifier for general purpose power supply application" 600 V 18 A
https://datasheetspdf.com/pdf-file/532202/AdvancedSemiconductor/1N1198/1
This is ordinary old  rectifier diode.

As I stated I know enough about the technology now to upgrade things past where Meyer left off due to his untimely death. I have made several changes and each one of them improved upon the technology as we have things to use now that Meyer didn't as they weren't invented in his time. The Schottky diode is just one of several upgrades I've made to this technology and most of these new upgrades I simply will not talk about as that's all me and it sets me apart from the rest of the folks that are also working on this technology. Remember not a soul has showed voltages being applied to their exciter arrays to match what I showed I was doing back in 2013 at the Global BEM held in Boulder, Colorado. Trust me I am looking for someone to show high voltages to their exciter arrays practically every day and I haven't seen anything in more than 8 years now. People are stuck in the stone ages concerning this technology as far as I can tell as they are still having the water heat up with their work and voltages no where near the ionization threshold for the atoms that make up the water molecules so that they will release their electrons and get the party started.


I'm always looking but never finding and still to this day I have people like you that question my work when it's clear I now seem to stand alone. No one ask any questions towards what I am doing differently than what they are doing and when I give advice people like you show up to tell people to not follow that advice. What a strange world we live in where people say they want this technology but their actions speak otherwise.

[Sergh]

Ordinary electrolysis begins on the surface of the electrodes with a voltage of about 2 volts between them. What is the required strength of the electric field on the molecule for ordinary electrolysis? On the near-electrode double electric layer of the molecule is also 2 volts. But the molecules are very small. The strength of the electric field for electrolysis is enormous. 5 MILLION VOLTS per ONE MILLIMETER! Impossible reality ..? Is your circuit capable of creating such tension without breakdown?

At a potential difference of, for example, U = 2 V and a molecular thickness of d = 0.4 nm, the electric field strength is     E =    5000    kV/mm    To compare this figure with values from other capacitor types requires an estimation for electrolytic capacitors, the capacitors with the thinnest dielectric among conventional capacitors. The voltage proof of aluminum oxide, the dielectric layer of aluminum electrolytic capacitors, is approximately 1.4 nm/V. For a 6.3 V capacitor therefore the layer is 8.8 nm. The electric field is 6.3 V/8.8 nm = 716 kV/mm, around 7 times lower than in the double-layer. The field strength of some 5000 kV/mm is unrealizable in conventional capacitors. No conventional dielectric material could prevent charge carrier breakthrough. In a double-layer capacitor the chemical stability of the solvent's molecular bonds prevents breakthrough.^[3]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double-layer_capacitance
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_layer_(surface_science)

[h20power]

Since we are talking to one another let me ask you a question. What is your end goal in posting in this thread and/or in talking to me or anyone else about this technology in this thread I made? I mean you've shown no work whatsoever in this field of study but you seem to think you have something to teach me, yes? So, what's your plan?


I'm sure you will find a lot of suckers to fall for your BS as they are always out there looking for ways to cheat their way into this technology so that they can make some cash from it. I'm talking about the people that don't want to get the needed tools for the task at hand and those that simply can't afford to get the stuff they need to be able to effectively work on this technology as this technology isn't on the cheap side to do correctly. Plus all those that come into this technology thinking it's a lie because they can't get any positive results when they spent a little time experimenting with it.


I'd also like you to point out anyone else achieving the same or higher voltages being applied to their water fuel capacitor/exciter array as I am currently doing while the temperatures of the water bath just follows the temperatures of the day, IE, not generating any waste heat as electrolysis does just as eye witnesses spoke about when they viewed Meyer's technology first hand.


You see I haven't the time or desire to waste time dealing with people like you who haven't put in the work, or haven't shown any result of their work to the fine people of this forum. I've already stated that if anyone want's me to listen to what they have to say they must show me they are doing close too or better than I am doing while following the scientific method as if not it's just noise to me that I generally will completely tune out. You see in all the time I have been working on this technology learning the science behind the patents I see less than a handful of people whom also get how this technology works. The vast majority of people who want in on this technology simply aren't willing to put in the time, effort, and finances that is required to get this technology up and running. And of those people some of them get totally frustrated in the results they get and throw in the towel or assume Meyer was a lair and all of this is just a load of BS.


I've went out of my way to give the science part of this technology away but sadly no one out there seems to understand it. So, I push on as I know sooner or later I will save up the funds needed to buy the equipment I need to finish this as I have to cut out as many of the middle men as possible if this technology is to be affordable to the masses.


Shalom,
Edward

[h20power]

Hi Edward,


The fact that your coils make a ringing sound has direct bearing on one of my non-Meyer projects (Star Trek phaser). Normally, I try to repay information with information, but you're so advanced in your field, compared to me, that there's nothing I might say to help you. So I sent a hundred to your go fund me account. Thanks again.


I wish everyone else would try to help a little too. Everyone of us is going to benefit once you get everything sorted out, and have the equipment you need to get the cost down.

Thanks so much Jerry,


Of all the people I have seen working on this technology you are perhaps one of the brightest as you seem to grasp the little things like how photosynthesis is related to this technology and how mainstream science completely missed how a plant goes about breaking the bonds of the water molecules. These little things are important and you seem to understand that.
A lot of what I found out about this technology went outside of scientific norms and into areas were they missed a lot of things in their rush to say they knew all there is to know about a subject. To this day I have only found one paper that correctly tells how a thunderstorm works while the rest of the studies on thunderstorms simply get it wrong which is sad as those wrong studies are what is being taught in our schools to our children.


Plus thanks for teaching me what "Bifilar Wrap" means as I never forgot that lesson.


Again thanks so much as right now it is truly needed,


Edward

[kolbacict]

I am tormented with my tank radio station.
In fact, there are two independent paths for the upper and lower frequency ranges.
But so far unsuccessful, they do not want to work at the same time.
Trying to run them at the same time. In order  to have a difference frequency in a cell.
After all, we can create directly in the cell, any difference frequency of two generators.
You want five kilohertz, you want twelve ...
And if the phases of the two high-frequency oscillations are synchronized, this will not lead to heating of the water, will it?
And at frequencies of tens of megahertz, we can use generally non-contact electrodes. For example, covered with glass or ceramics.