Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim

[wattsup]

@BEP

I'm at the office. That base is from my Eight Ball Wheel located here;
http://www.purco.qc.ca/ftp/Wattsups'%20stuff/eight-ball-wheel/

My rotor neo magnets are 8 pounds pull each.

@queue

I see you are in Montreal. I'm in Terrebonne. Come over one day.

@Mylow

Don't worry about them two legged vultures. They cannot do anything to you because this is now open source and way too late for them to stop anything. That's probably why they brought back your wheel. I know it is surely very stressfull just to have lived through such an experience but this was their first and last mistake.

@stefan

I have had it on this thread and having to accept freely dished out brash insults from a bunch of assholes who are curiosly spending so much time on an overunity forum wondering why people here work on overunity devices and the like. There is too much blah blah. If you will permit me to open a new thread for Mylow Wheel Builders with full moderator access and I will ban some members from the start. End of story. Guys having to wade through pages and pages of simple nonsence and total crap is just untenable. Builders could migrate their specs, etc to the new thread and @stefan you can then lock this thread before it accumulates more crap or keep it open and use it like sticky fly paper so members can have their jollies. Please PM me if this is OK with you. Just pages and pages of crap and a major waste of time.

[Omnibus]

Do I take it you now believe the Mylow Motor to be a scam, Omnibus?

Obviously. I took it as such from the get go, as you may check earlier in this thread. I think this is @alsetalokin at play here pulling a variation of his elaborate scam. As a matter of fact, @alsetalokin's scam to fight the perceived wide-eyed enthusiasts of overunity was the first professionally organized one I've seen. Wonder what the next episode of this sick soap opera is gonna be. How low THEIRLOW can get. All these @xpenzif, Danny from Ohio, Mike and Bedini's motor, the Lego guy etc. are just amateurs compared to those that have launched @alsetalokin. There is, however, a consolation for us from not appearing as total morons taken in -- there are even greater morons such as Steorn still allowing @alsetalokin to dirty their site.

I don't know about you but, the above notwithstanding, I won't stop exploring further overunity while having a good chuckle at these sorry attempts of the @alsetalokin's of the world to destroy this area of research. The closest I wanna see in this respect is @CLaNZeR's experiments tomorrow as well as @queue's trials as well as everyone else's who's magnets haven't arrived yet. There are three classes of people doing this, legitimate researchers such as the mentioned, you and I included, armchair watchers and the amateur and organized (such as @alsetalokin) mediocrity trying to put a spanner in the works in any possible way.

[jibbguy]

I's not "optimism" Grimer, it's just a desire to see something in the way of real, meaningful results and not just idle, unknowing speculation masquerading as "surity"..."For" or "Against".

There's only one way to answer these questions.

[chaser]

@Queue -  could you share with us where you bought your magnets?

[jibbguy]

I don't know if you got the point of it then....

> Should the device be proved not to work, then the data recorded by multiple people using multiple set-ups / minor design changes / different settings can quickly end debate as to whether: "Oh that replication wasn't done right, so just reject it".

> Should the device be proved to work; it then hopefully allows for faster & easier reproductions and improvements in the future.

Either way, suggesting "it shouldn't be done" at all is a rather curious response, imo (but not unexpected, lol). Personally, i would leave that one up to the Replicators to do as they see fit.

But i'm sure the test plan could be improved