Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim

[duff]

Hi duff,

These blueprints and comments are for another magnetic motor Howard Johnson successfully made and that went to the military. They probably used it in their diesel submarines.

The discussion of this thread is the Stonehenge motor which is a different design and concept.

Take care,

Michel

Michel,

I'm well aware of the discussion!

I feel the magnetic principles are the same and this model has the  same demagnetization problems. Hectors insight are a good thing.


-Duff

[k4zep]

Hi LightRider,

Thanks for all the video analysis!  Excellent work.  The believers will continue to believe, the thinkers will think, the thoughtful will study your data and
for what its worth, the data pretty well says it all. 

I remain, bummed out but eternally optimistic!


Ben

[X00013]

** re-post with this time a graphic**

Analysis of Mylow video #7 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7PZ18uTPCg)
Note # 1 moving video camera.
Note # 2 the movie have 1612 frames (1 frames = aprox. 0.04s)
Note # 3 Frames 0 to 641 not usable
Note # 4 Frames 642 to 966 the rotor make 4 full revolutions : 1 rev. in 67 frames, 2 rev. in 70 frames, 3 rev. in 73 frames and 4 rev. in 80 frames. **So each round takes longer (deceleration).
Note # 5 Frames 967 to 1335 Mylow turn around and show his bed for aprox.368 frames. not usable.
Note # 6 Frames 1336 to 1472 the rotor make 2 full revolutions : 1 rev. in 66 frames and 2 rev. in 70 frames.**So each round takes longer (deceleration).
Note # 7 While the camera caught the bed, the revolutions of the engine accelerated.

Important note, the data include a margin of error and are based on some estimates. These tests are for fun only and are in no way a rigorous scientific approach.

** correction in the graphic: "Rotor outside the scope of the camera" instead "Rotor is Stop", Thanks **

Thanks,

Thanks and all but I got different results, how did u come up with note #6 "2 full rotations", i got four rotations. What software are you using? Thanx

[LightRider]

Hi LightRider,

Thanks for all the video analysis!  Excellent work.  The believers will continue to believe, the thinkers will think, the thoughtful will study your data and
for what its worth, the data pretty well says it all. 

I remain, bummed out but eternally optimistic!


Ben

It would be impossible for me to say it in a better way, thanks.
LightRider

[LightRider]

Thanks and all but I got different results, how did u come up with note #6 "2 full rotations", i got four rotations. What software are you using? Thanx

You probably quite right X00013, that is why i put this note:
Important note, the data include a margin of error and are based on some estimates. These tests are for fun only and are in no way a rigorous scientific approach.

   
But to answer more clearly:

Video 41b (fix video camera) I used a mini-sensor for detecting light / movement while playing the video to make the data acquisition.
Video 6 and 7 (moving video camera) I made a image by image analysis. Much longer process and the possibility of error is much greater.

To consider that a turn is complete and usable, I made the following working hypothesis:
# 1 there must be a fixed mark that does not move during a cycle,
# 2 there must be a mobile mark without confusion during a cycle,
# 3 the two marks must meet at the beginning and at the end of the cycle and be visible during these meetings.
# 4 the method should be fast because the video contains more than 15,000 frames to be analyzed one by one.
# 5 when there was doubt eventhough it is small, the data cycle was rejected.

People with better equipment and / or software can certainly make a more detailed and more accurate analysis.

Thanks for your comment,
LightRider