Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim

[sterlinga]

Hi Dan,

Those are very nice-looking graphics.  Thanks for sending them.  I've posted them at http://peswiki.com/index.php/OS:MYLOW:Drawings:Dan_Jonsson


OS:MYLOW:Drawings:Dan Jonsson - In addition to providing some good-looking graphics of Mylow's design, Dan Jonsson proposes and electromagnetic variant. "The whole idea is that you could implement the Bedini principle in order to convert the magnetic flux to electricity and boost the opposit magnetic field to speed up the rotation, spin up the electrons and thus minimizing the demagnetization." (PESWiki; April 23, 2009)

I also added one of the graphics to the home page at http://mylowmagnetmotor.com

Sterling

----- Original Message -----
From: "DAN JONSSON"
To: "Sterling D. Allan"
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 9:38 AM
Subject: Re: Idea: Mylow joined with Keppe


I have tinkered a bit on mylows idea. I made some image i wanted to
present. I have more on the way but i wont work any more on them
unless they can be of inventress to any of you.

the whole idea is that you could implement the bedini principle
inorders to convert the magnetic flux to electricity and boost the
opposit magnetic field to speed up the rotation, spin up the electrons
and thus making the demagnetization kepping on a minimum.

If this is of use to any of you please let me know.

Best regards

Dan Jonsson

[dragon]

I have read his theories. The first thing a scientist should do is to be specific in his definitions. Malleable definitions are a sloppy way to address an issue, they cannot be pinned down to specifics, that's why lawyers like it so much. But that is only part of it. His theories rank about equal with the phlogiston theory that was very popular amongst scientists a while ago.  Not that Bearden's theories can even ascribe to that kind of popularity.

Hans von Lieven

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum#Quantum-mechanical_definition
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_state
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_particle
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casimir_effect
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_energy

"According to present-day understanding of what is called the vacuum state or the quantum vacuum, it is "by no means a simple empty space"[1], and again: "it is a mistake to think of any physical vacuum as some absolutely empty void."[2] According to quantum mechanics, the vacuum state is not truly empty but instead contains fleeting electromagnetic waves and particles that pop into and out of existence.[3][4][5]"

[chrisC]

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30372491/

[hansvonlieven]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum#Quantum-mechanical_definition
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_state
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_particle
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casimir_effect

"According to present-day understanding of what is called the vacuum state or the quantum vacuum, it is "by no means a simple empty space"[1], and again: "it is a mistake to think of any physical vacuum as some absolutely empty void."[2] According to quantum mechanics, the vacuum state is not truly empty but instead contains fleeting electromagnetic waves and particles that pop into and out of existence.[3][4][5]"

The only reason why the quantum guys call it a vacuum (which isn't a vacuum) is because they do not want to call it ether (aether) which is what they are really talking about. 

Hans von Lieven

[dragon]

The only reason why the quantum guys call it a vacuum (which isn't a vacuum) is because they do not want to call it ether (aether) which is what they are really talking about. 

Hans von Lieven

Define 'your' vaccum. No real vacuum (i.e. a space where nothing is really there) has been discovered, yet. The vacuum in the space is the quantum vacuum (or ether if you like it), and it's full of energy - no wonder that people want to find a way to use it.

BTW: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawking_radiation