Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim

[nyctuber]

i agree, i should have not said anything. i lost all patience after 270 pages of nyctuber's flip flopping sides every ten posts. he's shown himself to be a liar with zero integrity and that is an anathema to me. but that's no excuse. my bad, and i offer this as a mea culpa.

Unneccessary. I am allowed to change my mind, and you attacked me first. I have plenty of integrity, and am certainly not a liar. You spent 10 pages attacking me over semantics. 'End.'

[chrisC]

Logic does. A video is not evidence. Mylow has only shown videos. It is logical that a person who sincerely want's to provide proof would have offered some form of proof.

PL

PL:

Please STFU. Nobody here is interested in your post and logical points of view. I think Wattsup really needs to hasten the process.

cheers
chrisC

[zydubion]

Mylow has done the difficult part, getting a wheel to spin (without slowing) is a major step forward. I believe the gaps are an important element.  Fill the gaps and it will not run.  (Just an opinion) He (or we) can add a number of stators to the same wheel to increase torque.  Good job Mylow!

[PaulLowrance]

@PL
...
Now based on your last post, have it your way then. We'll add your name to the list.

I just saw this. ***Please*** by all means brother, ban me, but also ask stefan to ban me from this entire forum. In this forum I've publicly *begged* stefan to ban me from this entire forum and delete my account. Maybe you can succeed in getting stefan to ban me from this forum because it will save me a truckload of time. I'm here for one reason and one reason only, for the very few legit researchers. I'm not here for myself!  It appears stefan wants to continue to attract amateurs who prefer unscientific methods who IMO have next to no chance of succeeding in inventing a "free energy" machine. Unfortunately this forum is dominated by faith believers.

PL

[billmehess]

To wattsup

Please be very careful regarding this new level of censorship. In the US we have a term called ex post facto. This refers to setting up a new law after the fact. I would ask you to reconsider banning individuals who only wish to offer a counter path to what is now appearing to be the offical scantioned line.
If you wish to ban people please consider letting us all know what the new rules are and then if those rules are broken then I guess banning may become an option.
As for PL of course he has a right to post his opinion (as do we all) I saw nothing in his last post that should get him banned.
Mylow appears to becoming more open, if he had done this from the start there would have been much less fiction. Again he seems to be making small steps to validate his claims, these steps are positive but again verifaction other than videos posted on youtube are imperative.
Censorship of individuals should be considered very very carefully. What are the new rules wattsup, and let us go from there.