Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim

[Omnibus]

OK, he's back: http://www.youtube.com/user/MYLOW121363

[rrintoul]

Couldn't you cut one of these in half to replicate his C magnet?

http://www.leevalley.com/wood/page.aspx?c=1&p=40075&cat=1,42363,42348&ap=2

[Craigy]

Good excuse to play in the workshop 


Sorry no alinco or any other primative magnets avalible at this time , might have a go with loadstone tomorrow..



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qIsvd3YptLE

[lanblan4]

ramset;
I disagree.

Spinner is more like a true Skeptic.

However forums and internet gave rise to thousands of synical Psycho Skeptics.

You cant argue the facts I presented. Skeptics by nature dont look close enough at evidenence supporting the theory.

They are supposed to. But in reality, most Skeptics dont look for supporting evidence, only evidence to debunk the claim.

As well as a skeptic will only choose to critisize a theory, based on his belief of it not being real.

You dont see unbiased skeptics, looking at both sides of the evidence, indifferently.

You see the exact opposite, a quick reflax action quickly pointing out the first obvious flaws or good counter claims.

This is entirely wrong way to find Any evidence, Pro or Con.

That is why skeptics will always have the Lower hand.

Note: Some True, Open Minded, Unbiased (Qualified) Skeptics, ther are reports that after investing a claim they did not believe, afterwords they believed in it due to the amount of supporting evidence they uncovered.

That is how a real skeptic works.

Unfortunetly, the theories and belief patterns of real Scientists have been shrunk into biased to unconventional theories. Accordingly, wanabe scientist skeptics also learn these techniques and add ther own "logic" to the equation and you have a fumbled solution.

It just doesnt, wont, and will never work, skeptism is only counter-productive.

This does not mean to blindly believe, or be unbiased unfairly to the Pro side of the Theory. Neutral, both sides. So naturally the majority of believers and open minded people, lack this first obstacle of unbiased opinion.

Because a believer doesnt exscusivly believe, they are open to being wrong.

Where a skeptic on the most part, exsclusivly doesnt believe in it, because that is a definition of a skeptic. And more then often, gets defensive when there claim is challenged, they refuse to be wrong, and also dislike being wrong, as well as ther "Job" of being a skeptic means, when they prove a theory wrong, they won a prize.

They won the theoretical debate. Ther smarter because they debunked this "hoax". Thus the skeptic has another disadvantage and ther is a winning and reward factor when a skeptic succesfully "debunks" a theory.

On the other hand, the believer, experimentor, or True Skeptic, does not really care if they prove or disprove the theory. Because to them, proving the theory wrong, is the same reward as proven it right

[Craigy]

Couldn't you cut one of these in half to replicate his C magnet?

http://www.leevalley.com/wood/page.aspx?c=1&p=40075&cat=1,42363,42348&ap=2

no , as they are not diametrically magnetised. I don´t thing "C" Shaped magnets are required, although the opposite pole might be having some effect on the alinco but as the stator magnet is only about half an inch thick it will only really interact with the top of the Rotor C magnets or just the top pole. Although i would be nice to know for sure if all of those magnets are presenting the same poles etc.

Replacing the magnets with all neos like i just did , will probably not get you anywhere as the properties of the original magnets are unkown at present