Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim

Started by X00013, March 17, 2009, 06:27:33 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 27 Guests are viewing this topic.

nyctuber

Quote from: joe_1001101 on May 14, 2009, 11:06:07 PM
All that matters to me at this point is a running/rotating device replication.  Not a little one way track.  It sounded like Bedini was trying to instruct Mylow.  Yet Mylow is the one with the running PMM, not Bedini.  That's all :) 

I guess I am still upset about the new "Mylow Replication that works" - but didn't really work.  Let's all keep trying.

Joe

If you haven't already, watch Energy From The Vacuum. John Bedini has a specific reason for doing it this way. The bottom line is he's saying it works. Mind blower.

wattsup

@billmehess

Son of a gun. I was thinking of this also in the initial Mylow trials with my Pizza Pan Wheel. I  had also prepared a post on this idea but put it aside for some reason, probably because of all the noise.

But I do remember thinking long and hard about a multi-level wheel and had come to certain observations. but the gist of it was that more wheel with partial rotor segments means much more mass since each segment had to turn a mainly empty wheel. The solution I had thought of was to cut one wheel into several segments or pies that could then be stacked. This way there would be both no potential field crowning and the best forward potential.

Also I had figured that the number of rotors has to match the number of pies and the pies had to be enough to go all the way around the circle, or even further to 1 1/2 circles, as long as there are the same amount of pies as rotors per segment. This way, pie #1 has stator position at rotor #1, pie #2 has stator at rotor #2, and so on.

I had also figured out that there would have to be at least 8 rotors and eight pies. Rotor #1 is the repulsion, rotors #2 to #7 are the forward movements, rotor #8 is the sticky. With 8 rotors and pies, you would always have 6 forwards to counter 1 repulsion and 1 sticky.

Maybe one day I'll have TIME, if it is not spent on reading so many pages of so much voodoo science about a guy letting go of a wobbly mono weighted wheel that moved when he let it go. lol

Anyways, good to see someone is looking in this direction.

joe_1001101

Quote from: nyctuber on May 14, 2009, 11:11:18 PM
If you haven't already, watch Energy From The Vacuum. John Bedini has a specific reason for doing it this way. The bottom line is he's saying it works. Mind blower.

Some of us here will say it works.  Some say it doesn't work.   You and I know we need replications that work to prove it really works to the world.  Right?

Joe

nyctuber

According to the gapping Mylow just laid out, the rotor gaps are wider at the outer edge than the gap between the stators, and smaller on the inner edge (asymmetrically, of course).

I suppose that would have to be a given though, considering they are being placed around the edge of a disk.

But hey TK, another reason your replication didn't work?

nyctuber

Quote from: joe_1001101 on May 14, 2009, 11:15:56 PM
Some of us here will say it works.  Some say it doesn't work.   You and I know we need replications that work to prove it really works to the world.  Right?

Joe

Yes, but that's another story.