Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim

Started by X00013, March 17, 2009, 06:27:33 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 75 Guests are viewing this topic.

nyctuber

Quote from: capthook on May 18, 2009, 11:38:02 AM
WoW!  GREAT work!  You have found the visual proof of the fishing line drive belt!
In my vid:
( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dORKOhwLSP4 )
I was unable to actually see the line due to the low quality of the vid, but it was the actions of Mylow that showed he was manipulating the line.
Your excellent video work gives 100% proof! (along with your earlier excellent data plotting from before)

Goes to show there is ONLY 1 PROOF:
INDEPENDANT VERIFICATION
Without it - a video ain't for crap.

Special 'ouch' goes out to Sterling - you were told MANY times not to take the word of a shifty character as PROOF.

No, it's not mine, i'm not Finnish.

But YOURS got the ball rolling first, so hats off to YOU too!

**Applause!**

RunningBare

Yeah, it's also a bit odd how he accepts diallel lines making eggs stand up straight?, sorry, but his credibility to give any reasoning is at it's lowest.

Quote from: Mr. M on May 18, 2009, 11:38:18 AM
You mean the way he acknowledges the existence of the strings in the videos and then goes on to explain how the graphs show that the strings aren't the driving force behind the device ?

Yeah... I found that a bit odd too.   :-\

Pirate88179

Quote from: jibbguy on May 18, 2009, 10:36:36 AM
@Pirate

Lol you are getting no apology from me, not for calling out a person who is so determined to make their negative points that they would slam their target's father to do so. Remember the father did not comment, Sterling did... There's a big difference there and if you can't grasp that (more likely you just don't care), then there is something inherently wrong with this picture.

Yes of course i read your post, and putting a lame disclaimer at the end of the comment doesn't help: You wanted to try to nail Sterling any way you could, and dragged his father into it on as a means to your end. Then with a second post you later derided the father again as a means of trying to get cheap laughs.... No matter how you try to spin it, it is disgusting behavior and akin to a school-yard taunt.

Last night you guys in the echo chamber were all getting high on your "string theory discovery", and feeling your oats, and i suspect today that in retrospect you wouldn't have gone there. I would remind you all, that you STILL do not know the answers to these questions for sure, nor what is behind it.

I really don't give a rat's patootie about your moral fortitude or sense, but i do care whether or not this kind of behavior is allowed to go on without at least comment here.

Otherwise what will it be next, if such precedent is allowed?

Personal actions on cyberspace have consequences too. Anonymity and isolation from physical contact do not change that. I would urge people to not write any comments that they would not otherwise say to the person's face (lol like this will do any good, but it had to be said ;) ).

Thank you, I accept your apology.  That was very big of you to recognize that you misread my post.  I am glad I went back and added the edit to make it even more clear as I had no idea that some reading it would have such a low reading comprehension, so I thank you for pointing that out.

Just for the record, anything I type on here I would gladly say to anyone's face, in person, anytime, anywhere.  This also includes you.
***EDIT***  If there is anything unclear in this post, just let me know and I will try to clarify it for you.

Bill
See the Joule thief Circuit Diagrams, etc. topic here:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=6942.0;topicseen

TinselKoala

Quote from: Mr. M on May 18, 2009, 11:38:18 AM
You mean the way he acknowledges the existence of the strings in the videos and then goes on to explain how the graphs show that the strings aren't the driving force behind the device ?

Yeah... I found that a bit odd too.   :-\

Ahh, you're BAAACK.

Do my videos meet your specifications? I would not have done them, if not for you.

On which side of the fence did you fall, I wonder?

--TK

(Oh, and I think I can claim priority for the first public suggestion that Mylow's device could be powered this way, in a comment on one of my videos to AdminOnDuty, at least 3 days ago.)

EDIT I see that comment is still listed by YT as being "1 day ago" but it sure seems like 3 to me. In any event it was after the pedestal motor video and before the black thread video, which I know I posted Saturday sometime. I think.

RunningBare

Ok, I just gotta say it, Mr M is Mylow, look if people can say TK is Alsetalokin then I have the same right  ;)