Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim

Started by X00013, March 17, 2009, 06:27:33 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 45 Guests are viewing this topic.

TinselKoala

Quote from: lostcauses10x on May 20, 2009, 12:40:24 AM
TK try to do a static charge on the bar you are sliding the magnet down. Extra or less electrons may show some interesting effect.  Of course you will then need to think of a way to place the magnet without disturbing the charge on the rod, and to insulate the magnet from the charge.

Don't back out the door on the electron spin thing of contracting and expanding orbit. LOL

I can certainly put a charge on the bar. But can you be more specific about what hypothesis we are testing, and what some possible results might be and how they might relate to the overarching theory (which I guess is about those contracting and expanding orbits...).
I gotta tell you though, I buy the whole quantum chemistry thing, and I might have different ideas about electron orbits and energy levels than you do.

nyctuber

Quote from: TinselKoala on May 20, 2009, 12:41:29 AM
Erm. Uh...

Why (or how) are Mylow's fishing lines parallel at the width of his base assembly, if they just wrap around the motor shaft at the other end? Shouldn't they be converging noticeably? I thought he did not use a pulley on the motor...??

The motor was at least 8 feet away. You really need to download that hi res video, its clearer than you can even imagine. Even while he's on his knees giving his little speech into the camera, there it is.


http://www.mininova.org/tor/2594618


All 9 

http://www.mininova.org/user/jahroen

markdansie

More damming evidence,
Implicates his brother as well on the six magnet device
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DLLSUV6rNPo

If Mylow doesnt come clean on the Stonehenge with either full confession or an independent validation , he will be very famous shortly. Time to get the mainstream media involved.
Mark






joe_1001101

Quote from: nyctuber on May 20, 2009, 12:48:00 AM
The motor was at least 8 feet away. You really need to download that hi res video, its clearer than you can even imagine. Even while he's on his knees giving his little speech into the camera, there it is.


http://www.mininova.org/tor/2594618


All 9 

http://www.mininova.org/user/jahroen

If I understand TK's question correct, even at 8 feet the lines would not be as parallel as they were.  I wondered about that motor shaft pic too on the couch.  The pic must not show the motor correct.

Joe

BEP

Quote from: BEP on April 30, 2009, 09:49:45 PM
John

Aluminum because the reactions to a moving flux are wildly different. Ferrous material simply shorts or redirects the flux. It doesn't matter if their is a relational movement or not.

The only time aluminum exhibits those qualities(?) is when there is relational movement. Of course it is paramagnetic so there is always some attraction.

I suggest you throw out any ideas this is related to a copper wound motor.

There was a time I spewed the wonders of aluminum but that has ended. If folks want to know I tell them to experiment and figure it out. If you can then tell the difference between copper and aluminum (magnetically) then you may be on the right track.
None of it is magic or fringe science. It just isn't well known, even though electrical products have used these wonders for over a hundred years.
When you can connect the info to the non-Faraday's Paradox.....

Still, I got slammed once too often.


Brainstorming here is not a good thing. The PC heroes and book vomiters will wipe out the conversation.

And yes Al is slightly diamagnetic but so are all conductive metals. Cu much more diamagnetic than many. The paramagnetic qualities of Al washes out the 'dia' with the more dominant 'para'.

Isn't anyone interested in the curl of the path for the sliding magnet?

It isn't angle. It is speed, magnet strength, conductivity, shape and mass and the same for the slide (strength reflecting the content of magnetic materials in the alloy).

Didn't someone say Mylow spoke of a magnet floating?

So, does that sound so silly now?


AAAAAAAAAARRRRRGGHHHH!!!!!