Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim

[Omnibus]

@PaulLawrance,

To clear the first point, yes, there are professors here. As for the history of the conventional science, I won’t look in these books, because these books are books of the suppression, squashing exactly the phenomena we’re discussing here. Asking the conventional science to decide about them is to give the sheep to the wolf. @chrisC already said, “Mylow has already bend over backwards to give people all the information and video that proved this stuff only needed to be replicated independently by others. What else can academia prove?” What is needed now are devoted people who can really make things and have unambiguously proven that in this forum. I already mentioned a few of them. If I’m to be afraid to death for Mylow it would be exactly of the opposite to what you said. The so-called academia is the reactionary force in this case and it is the real threat. And I know what I’m talking about because one of the mentioned by Mylow victims, Gene Mallove, was my dear friend and I have set up a charitable organization named for him.

[Grimer]

Omnibus,

You speak so highly of people here with this "proven record."  Is there a notable scientist or professor posting as this forum? If so, then send them. If not, then please show me *one* major breakthrough here. Look in the history books if you want to see what conventional science has achieved over the past century. Go ahead and throw your rocks at conventional science if you want. I want someone who at least understands the meaning of unambiguous science, not hand waving or claims, etc. What is this "proven record" person going to do?  Take measurements? Anyone can take measurements. I'm looking for measurements and far beyond that. Who can do that here? A lot of talk about how conventional science, FEMM, etc. etc. is so wrong. It may not be perfect, but show me one clear cut experiment that proves FEMM is wrong, or conventional physics is wrong within any reasonable limits. You might say mylow's experiment proves FEMM wrong. Hmm, perhaps you should look at my website to see clear cut FEMM results showing free energy. Have you entered mylow's device in a 3D magnetics software? To be real honest with you, I'd be afraid to death for mylow to have anyone get near the guy that you'd recommend. Sorry, but that's being honest!

PL

Presumably eliminate the possibility of fraud. That's all that's required at this stage. It doesn't need an academic for that.

[Omnibus]

Exactly. Also, have a first hand examination of the device by devoted people experienced in manufacturing and having facilities for such, so that working replicas can see the light of the day sooner.

[Low-Q]

Has anyone who watched the video taken a look at the speed of that wheel? If you measure the time for each round, it seems thee is a 33 RPM turntable in the drawer under it that drives it via magnet transmission.... maybe it is 45 RPM, but sure not 78RPM turntable - just a thought that might be worth some attention.

Br.

Vidar

[PaulLowrance]

To clear the first point, yes, there are professors here.

I haven't seen any. Then send them. Maybe this person does not post.

As for the history of the conventional science, I won’t look in these books, because these books are books of the suppression, squashing exactly the phenomena we’re discussing here.

If that's true, then at least academic science has accomplished something.

Asking the conventional science to decide about them is to give the sheep to the wolf. @chrisC already said, “Mylow has already bend over backwards to give people all the information and video that proved this stuff only needed to be replicated independently by others.

Sorry, but it's not proven yet. I could ask mylow to do a truck load of experiments on his machine, but feel lucky to even get the glass table experiment.

What else can academia prove?”

How much time do you have. 1. That it works.  2. How it works. 3. How to replicate it. 4. How to improve it. 5. A mathematical model.

What is needed now are devoted people who can really make things and have unambiguously proven that in this forum.

Academic scientists can't make things?


A university would have access to a lot of expensive equipment.


PL