Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim

[capthook]

And I HAVE to 2nd your Ditto wattsup

Having gone back and forth from it's real/it's a fake, I'm settling in more towards the real.  The questions/thoughts for me are:

1) The 'off-angle' orientation of the fields between the stator (E-W) and the rotor (N-S) is an odd arrangement and I believe results in a narrow field of the rotor magnets (N-S) producing a 'small sticky' spot that is overcome by the weight/size of the rotor and its flywheel effect.

2) The u-shaped stator is a somewhat unorthodox approach.

3) Whether it's possible to construct a working device using rare-earth/stronger magnets as it seems to work due to the weak magnets/weak 'sticky spot'

4) Is the effect present only due to the degaussing of the stator? (edit: this is a biggy and IMO is a high probability meaning it's not OU/Free Energy but just using the stator as a 'battery'.  But, then again, as has been mentioned, one could 'recharge' the stator for 'free' via a stack of neos)

5) Can the above points be overcome and the design be improved to create enough torque to run a generator?

[Omnibus]

@capthook, thanks for the screen shots. I can see why Hans is so skeptical, however. We all are. This claim is so out of the ordinary that all kinds of things come to mind until the guy allows a visit. Let’s not get carried away, though, in our skepticism and avoid throwing in far-fetched proposals. The cat that sneaks from underneath the motor in one of the last videos is not the perpetrator of the fraud by driving the motor, neither is the gap between magnets impossibly big to say gotcha or the dish washing one hears in the background helping the motor to run.

By the way, the proposal for an electromagnet as stator which someone already gave and @k4zep reiterated is a very good one, to study the appropriate conditions for the appearance of the effect. Once established, it’s easy to condition the induction of a permanent magnet at the appropriate value or values which allow the motor to spin.

[Omnibus]

Mylow has been asked more than once by various people to have the camera secured at a position of full view of the motor and have the motor run for the maximum 10min youtube allows for. What's the problem, why wouldn't he do that? Aside from other things, it would help to measure, as in Finsrud's case whether or not it's slowing down (it wasn't in Finsrud's over 40min video). Whoever has the rapport currently with Mylow, please ask him to carry out that simple project (simple, provided the whole story isn't fake) -- videoing in full view the motor running for 10min.

P.S. Incidentally, @capthook, you're asking to stay on topic but you are continuing with the degaussing. It has been said more than once, this is not the issue. Furthermore, such degaussing conventionally cannot be the driver of the motor and even if present it cannot overthrow the OU essence of what is seen, if real. So let's not get back over and over again to non-issues and waste bandwidth.

[Paul-R]

Mylow has been asked more than once by various people to have the camera secured at a position of full view of the motor

On their own, videos aren't worth a piss in a bucket.
What we need is a set of engineering drawings, or at least the data to generate the same.

[Paul-R]

It's only been a few days since Mylow posted his Mar. 17 video showing acceleration and continuous rotation in his replica of HJ's magnet motor.
It seems like a month, so much has happened.
the person could answer most of the question, then ask Mylow when there are new questions for which his input is needed.
Sterling <sterlingda at pureenergysystems.com>

If he releases specifications + engineering drawings, or at least the data for us to generate them, then half the workload may vanish.
Paul.