Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim

[waynegage]

What a fun thing to do on a Sunday afternoon. Logic has it's applications but sometimes little relevance. Here's my supporting logic and suppot that your assertion MAY be correct: Howard Johnson does and did not have a magnet motor simply because you did not see it. However. if you ever paid attention to any of his videos your position might change. Also your assertion MAY be correct (that he 'does not have' a magnet motor) and this could be correct because he is unfortunately deceased. But you are totally unqualified, except by the previously described logic, to propose that he 'did' not ever have a working magnet motor.  Your process of logic has some seriously boxed holes in it.

I have a friend who claims to drive his chevy home to the moon each night. By your reasoning that there is no proof that he doesn't, he may be right.
You need to sharpen your reasoning skills.

[lostcauses10x]

Power to the birds, man...

Have you tried wrapping the line around a bird? 

[TinselKoala]

Have you tried wrapping the line around a bird? 

Just for you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pyAPyS1MbdQ

[nyctuber]

Just for you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pyAPyS1MbdQ

LOL

[jibbguy]

@ Wagegage,

Ahh, again we are just "ordered" to believe you on that subject

I am curious: Following that logic, would you also state that: "There is no 'Aurora Space Plane' ", because no one has admitted to ever seeing it?

You see, most people who follow military aeronautics would say there probably is an "Aurora" vehicle of some type... At least they won't flat deny it as "impossible". Yet there is very little to back this except maybe some dribbles of "insider knowledge". Where is the Patent for it? Where are the eyewitnesses who publicly admit to seeing it? Where are the surviving prototypes? Where is the Congressional funding for it?

Of course since if it exists at all, then it must be a "top secret project", then these things by inference can't be seen yet; until the information is released.

Whether this example translates exactly or not to the ultimate existence of a PMM is not the point: But that to deny existence of something, with zero  proof to back it, verses some proofs existing on the other side, is meaningless talk that should be viewed only as someone's opinion... Freely given; and valued the same

You are certainly entitled to it, imo.... Although repeating it at least 4 times here is a little much (counting the last); and thus earned you the comment in the first place, when usually we just ignore these meaningless proclamations based only on personal opinion.