Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim

[i_ron]

Considering the pack had only one member, your comment is quite silly.

Nah, the three of you are lock step... class bully sort of thing,
dominate and control.

Ron

[i_ron]

My cat killed a few of the pack just this morning. i ron better watch out:)

LOL, yep this list needs a good ratter, can she type?

Ron

[nyctuber]

Nah, the three of you are lock step... class bully sort of thing,
dominate and control.

Ron

Not at all. You have nothing to back up your accusations about Al, it ain't my fault.

[i_ron]

Not at all. You have nothing to back up your accusations about Al, it ain't my fault.

Miki made a statement and you jumped on him inappropriately in my view. I said nothing about Al so why would I need to have something to back up a non accusation?

Miki's remark was conjecture...

"In scientific philosophy, Karl Popper pioneered the use of the term "conjecture" to indicate a proposition which is presumed to be real, true, or genuine, mostly based on inconclusive grounds,"

Therefore your hostile remark was ill considered. The statement required you to look at Miki's evidence and judge for yourself whether you would have come to the same conclusion based on that evidence. If you had evidence to the contrary, that evidence should have been presented.

But to an outside observer, your reply was so typical as to be indistinguishable from several other of the dominant members, hence the pack comment.

Ron
   

[nyctuber]

Miki made a statement and you jumped on him inappropriately in my view. I said nothing about Al so why would I need to have something to back up a non accusation?

Miki's remark was conjecture...

"In scientific philosophy, Karl Popper pioneered the use of the term "conjecture" to indicate a proposition which is presumed to be real, true, or genuine, mostly based on inconclusive grounds,"

Therefore your hostile remark was ill considered. The statement required you to look at Miki's evidence and judge for yourself whether you would have come to the same conclusion based on that evidence. If you had evidence to the contrary, that evidence should have been presented.

But to an outside observer, your reply was so typical as to be indistinguishable from several other of the dominant members, hence the pack comment.

Ron
   

Miki's statement is that Al is full of crap and only out to sell a book. I disagreed, perhaps you misunderstood.

Al has said a number of interesting things, Miki hasnt offered any reason as to why he should be dismissed.