Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim

[lwh]

Great to see everyone's hopes and enthusiasm still alive and kicking here.  But thank God too some of you are still waiting for a video that shows the motor running without anyone pushing it by hand. 

Everything I've seen and heard and read about this has left me convinced that's what's been happening.  Of all the video's the guy's posted there is not one single one that dipsels that most obvious  possibility, just the opposite in fact.  Looking forward to that video, the first one he should have shot.  No need for a tripod btw, just get someone else to hold the camera or put it on a chair tilted to show the motor being started up and left to run on the floor.  And yes I know that won't be conclusive proof, as such video's can be faked too, but fakery on that level requires access to talent and equipment and commitment of a higher degree than what's been shown so far.  It's just one of the simplest, most obvious preliminary tests, but still it hasn't been passed.   

So yeah, just waiting for that, then some credible witness testimony, preferably with their own video's of the thing running as claimed, then I'll be all over it too.  Should be good.  Not interested in excuses though, of any kind.  And at this point, any and all possible reasons for the verification not happening will be considered excuses.  That's just where I'm at with this, after only three years of this bullshit.  I'm not interested in being lied to by people who may be genuine believers in overunity but who make false claims in the hope that it may encourage others to help them achieve what they could not.  But hey, who knows, maybe that's how things actually get done.  Not willing to waste my time and effort betting on it though.  At the same time however, I don't want to discourage people from having their own kind of fun with this, so I'll just shut up now, instead of describing in detail why I'm not buying into it.

All the best to you all, honestly, and that means you too Mylow.

P.S.
I strongly recommend the replicators start a new thread, called the replication thread, and get anyone who intrudes on it with skepticism banned.  I would also recommend to whoever feels strongly that they should continually offer skeptical viewpoints here, that they also start their own thread and do so there.  This thread should be locked or used solely for updating news about Mylows own work or news about it from elsewhere.  The creation of such threads should be standard practice here to avoid unecessary aggravation for all.  It's not fair for the replicators or the skeptics to claim this thread as their own and the niggling and arguing that results is a pain in the arse for everyone.  Of course, those who just want to argue could start up a fourth thread.  At least ask yourselves which thread you would post into before saying anything else in this one.                 

[pillager]

One of our posts for every twenty of yours is very giving on our end.

PL

So you think your spam posts are good then. 

[wattsup]

@i_ron

I was also thinking about a two piece but I am sure the one piece will be better and not risk any stray fields from exiting between a two piece design. I will start a cad drawing of both tonight and send it to my CNC guy. I will also have a bolt thread under each rotor and will design the disk to have some sliding opening that will make for easy spacing adjustments from inter 3-set spacing to all equal spacing. The gluing seems too permanent. Also, I will only use only three sets and not include the fourth to ensure SYMMETRIC DESIGN. lol

I am also thinking of putting a lever to adjust the angle of the stator magnet to see if it will turn any faster.

My design will not have a top support. Everything will come off a still center shaft and only the disk with rotors will be on two bearings all supported on a tripod (or quadpod). Since I don't plan on making many versions of this I want it to be as flexible as possible to try other things.

@sterlinga

I am sure the Ivy Leagers have access to the net and can see these builds as they occur. A 30th of March time frame does not seem realistic.

[chrisC]

This device is simple enough that it can be easily replicated.  The last thing I would recommend is take it to "professionals".
If replication is successful, then the universities can replicate it themselves.  How many posts have you made on this? 50? ...WE HEARD YOUR POINT...MOVE ON PLEASE....

I agree. People like this really should not clog up threads like this. They contribute nothing useful and jab too much. I thought I knew a good Flip flopper in Bill Clinton. At least he was charming (Bill I meant)!

cheers
chrisC

[Omnibus]

@CLaNZeR,

If he posts a 10min video on youtube without speaking in the background (or perhaps 60min on google video, preferably) we can time it precisely and determine whether or not there's wind down. No need for a tach. Do you remember the similar measurements we did using the 40min videos of Finsrud's device? There was no winding down there.