Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim

[lostcauses10x]

"No, he wrote "electromagnet.""

Problem with this is the stator magnet deterioration.  It is not conclusive to an "electromagnet."
Yet who know but Mylow. Until folks give up on replication, more information will be coming. Time will tell.

[carbonc_cc]

@carbonc_cc,

You may recall that the entrance barrier was exactly the problem with the tri-gate. Magnetic propulsor has the exit barrier problem while the tri-gate (and here too) the problem is the entrance barrier. We're at square one. Here is the crux of the matter, has Mylow resolved this problem or not? Still remains to be seen.

Well, I'm not so sure about that as well.
If the momentum of the rotor is enough to overcome the exit barrier, then is it also enough to overcome the entrance barrier?  All it would need is just enough to pass the gate so the attraction starts up again...

Things I expect to observe in the future:
1: When more and more magnets are applied to the rotor (in the orentation with gaps), the rotor is able to keep a constant speed. 
Speeds up then Slows down during and after passing the last rotor magnet (exit barrier).

2: The Strongest field of the whole of all the rotors always stays with the first and last rotor in the whole set. (that I have physically observed so far)

3: When completing a full circle of magnets, the Strongest fields seem to diminish by spreading across the whole.  The gaps then become the strongest fields.

4. When the stator approaches the "sweet spot" (middle of the repelling field between stator and rotor) at a gap point starting the rotor spinning, it passes each weak gate to the next set of rotors (maybe due to momentum) in a full circle.  (heh, the big question here...)

[lostcauses10x]

Of course it does, but how much???
Such does depend on the material and magnetic property of the magnet also.  This device is taking a good magnetic vibration across on of the poles of the stator magnet. His magnet does show some interesting results of such.

@lostcauses10x,

You are givin an incorrect explanation should Mylow claim turns out to be real. Realigning of domains in a permanent magnet requires energy input not the opposite, as you incorrectly understand.

[PaulLowrance]

@lostcauses10x,

You are givin an incorrect explanation should Mylow claim turns out to be real. Realigning of domains in a permanent magnet requires energy input not the opposite, as you incorrectly understand.

Hopefully last post for awhile. Shhhh, lol, anyhow, onmin is correct in terms of present technology, but in the dirty details there's actually more kinetic energy released after magnetizing a magnet than what was put into the magnetization. The reason is found in MCE (magnetocaloric effect). Potential energy found in unorganized ferromagnetic moments are converted into kinetic energy, but most of such KE is quickly converted back into PE by a change in specific heat capacity. So, there is a gain in KE, but according to 2LoT such energy is unavailable energy. The 2LoT will fall within the next decade, to be known as 2ToT.

PL

[Omnibus]

In no way is degaussing the explanation for the purported effect. Just the opposite, degaussing is detrimental to such effect. This should be understood once and for all.