Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim

Started by X00013, March 17, 2009, 06:27:33 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 23 Guests are viewing this topic.

queue

Quote from: Axle on March 31, 2009, 10:25:13 PM
Have caught the 'Mylow bug'. Am working on a ~1/2 scale rig.
I won't have magnets for at least 2 weeks. Axle

i think you're not alone on this one lol .. thanks for the peek ahead.

Heres mine so far.. pretty much ready to do some tests even though .. i am still quite skeptical.

Will document here and on my site ..
http://overunity.ca/mylow

More to come
Queue

Omnibus

QuoteWhether his machine is overunity or not is another question, but he does seem to be able to get it to achieve sustained periods of rotation and he does have something interesting here.

Have no doubt, if he starts the rotor from stand-still at the “sweet spot” and the rotor makes more than one turn on its own, this is an overunity machine beyond doubt. Unfortunately, he hasn’t shown that yet. If he has the real thing it’s not difficult to demonstrate and not beat around the bush with the evident dead-ends almost everybody here has experience with which he demonstrates in his latest videos.

QuoteOn the subject of MYLOW refusing to have someone from a university look at it, I think he's quite right.  Is any professor (who wants to keep his job / grant / funding) really going to agree to witnessing a perpetual motion machine?  Get real.
...
The best evidence will come from successful 3rd party replications,
...

Can’t agree more.

Omnibus

Cutest cat.Seems she (looks like a girl) can't wait either to see the overunity machine crunching. Looks like she's coming up with the answer any moment.

ellubpt

Queue

Nice set up.
From where did you source your magnets??

Grimer

Quote from: Omnibus on March 31, 2009, 08:44:54 PM
@nyctuber,

I can see how Mylow’s motor can be done in principle. The question is whether or not Mylow has really done it. Constructing a device producing excess energy continuously is a very difficult engineering project.

Otherwise, in principle, it is clear how this can work. I’ve proven it beyond a shadow of a doubt. A device such as the magnetic propulsor that I’ve demonstrated so many times here produces excess energy discontinuously. One can easily assemble a linear set of these magnetic propulsors in a linear manner and an object (a ball) can travel large linear distances this way. This has been shown repeatedly by many constructors and there are multiple threads existing here in this forum, demonstrating such devices.

As I’ve already said, the promising aspect in Mylow’s device is that he’s using a large diameter disc which approximates the behavior of these linear devices I mentioned above. Also, the weak magnets he’s using  make them act as isolated entities, uncoupled with the other groups of magnets. One mistake many, including myself, did when replicating Torbay motor was the use of strong neodymium magnets which where cooperating badly and the mentioned effect couldn't show itself.

So, these are the promising, expected aspects in Mylow’s machine which he chooses to forgo while getting in the dead-ends known to almost anyone who has done such experiments.

Make no mistake, finding the sweet spot and letting the rotor go from a standstill leading the rotor to making more than one turn by itself is a self-starter. Mylow is confused about that and he should now hear it and understand it. Don’t bother, Mylow, with other things, show the rotor starting from the sweet spot from a stand-still and show it in a full-view video that the rotor is making several full turns by itself. That’s all. If the machine really works, this should be easy to be accomplished even with the drained stators he already used in his very first videos.

We should not get sidetracked and lose the focus of this research.


Congratulations, Omni. I think your post is spot on. I agree on the SMOT. I agree on the diameter point. I agree on the "isolated entities, uncoupled with the other groups of magnets". And I agree that there is a danger of losing focus.

The only point where we probably disagree in on whether Mylow has already proved his point or not. Looking back at some of your posts you seem to blow hot and cold on this, in particular at one point I seem to remember you upbraided him for being a fake.

Having watched all the videos I am confident that Mylow is telling the truth with respect to the 24 hour run. Even if he or anyone else fails to reproduce his result that original run stands as far a I'm concerned. Fortunately, his experiment is so easy and relatively cheap to produce (unlike HJ's bananas) that I've no doubt it will be - many times. Indeed, J.R.Hall has already given testimony of the gate performance and even Paul has suggested that one of his rough and ready analyses supports Mylow.
Who is she that cometh forth as the morning rising  -  Fair as the moon. Bright as the sun  -  Terrible as an army set in battle array.