Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim

[LightRider]

I disagree. If you've done the acquisition of the data you present of the video properly, it is very much a rigorous scientific approach. The problem is that the video, no foul play assumed, provides insufficient data (doesn't show how the spin of the rotor was started, for instance) to draw a definitive conclusion.

   
The statement was in relation to the three analyzes published only.
Insufficient data, preconceived ideas, test methods used to obtain data and analyze them, materials used ... etc..
From the three analyzes published, it is unlikely to be able to make some definitive conclusions.
LightRider

[plengo]

One thing that is definitely not a waste is this video analysis we are doing.

Remember one day, may be, someone may come up with a real replication and we can use this data as a baseline of sorts to validate either Mylow's replication or future replications.

Contradiction will certainly, if any, will dictate which one would be the real thing.

Another old wise saying I learned a long time ago is: watch the product of ones work and you will know that person.

Fausto.

ps: I am willing to help someone to go at Mylow's house and purchase his motor. Anyone willing to participate?

[sterlinga]

To ALL,
I did send José (Mylow) 2 emails, after he announced in a comment section
of his last video, that it was a fake.
> Regards, Stefan.

I just posted the following story at PESN:


http://pesn.com/2009/04/06/9501538_Mylow_Magnet_Motor_not_fake/

Mylow's All-Magnet Motor "Not a Fake"

Mylow gives more info about how his motor works, how the recent episode with the MIB guy (NSA) rattled him, tells of non-symmetric polarity in his stator magnet, encourages replication attempts.

[cloud camper]

"What's really whipping my butt is why the fellow inventors don't explain why it is working, rather than all the reasons why it couldn't possibly be working."

OK, Mylow is bummed cuz no one is coming up with theories why his motor is working.  I'll make a
stab at it.  Of course my theory closely parallels HJ's theory.

I believe HJ's main theory is the corner vortices.  He calls these spin fields.  The main idea to stress is
that the spin fields UNDERLIE, are MASKED, and are HIDDEN by the normal B fields.  The normal B fields are conservative and any implementation of them just results in symmetry.  HJ himself says "symmetry doesn't  work". 

Johnson described several gate systems in his book "Secret World of Magnets" and all of them involved canceling out, sinking out or nullifying the normal B fields, then using the remaining spin fields to do work.  You can think of these spin fields maybe something like the curled up dimensions
commonly described in superstring theory.  They don't extend very far but they are asymmetric.

In the Stonehenge motor pic attached below, it is seen that the tall channel magnets are fixed to large
permeability  plates.  The magnets are attached S side down so the permeability plate sinks out most
of the S generated B field. 

At the top of the tall channel magnets,  the N generated B field is also sunk by using large permeability plate surrounding the rotor magnets.  Now all we have remaining are the N generated spin fields, the opposing S generated spin fields are down and out of the way.

Then we have the stator magnet being curved with chiseled ends to try and get the stator B fields out
of the way and maximize the spin fields on the chiseled ends.  Notice that Howard is holding the
stator magnet up near the N end of the channel magnets.  The idea behind the motor is to sink out
the symmetric and conservative B fields and unmask the asymmetric and nonconservative spin
fields.  This is why every rotor magnet on the gate is N facing.  Individual spacing is not that critical,
but just requires that the stator maintain momentum until encountering the next spin field.

My machinist and I built a test gate over the weekend and noticed that while there was always a
repulsion hill at the entrance to the gate, it didn't seem to matter whether we used 7 magnets or
18, the stator would propel merrily along to the end of the gate and then begin to coast with no
back attraction.

It could be fortuitous that Mylow's magnets were so weak as I believe he said that he had purchased
them some 20 yrs ago and they had been left in a drawer until now.  This possibly had the effect of
diminishing the B fields to the point they did not need permeability plates to demonstrate the effect.
Anyway, just a preliminary theory.  As  we all know, the devil lies in the details!

[lostcauses10x]

"...the Congressman's secretary confirmed that an NSA visit did indeed take place with Mylow on Friday."Oh this is to **** good.