Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim

[queue]

Mylow indicated reversing the center magnet reverses the disc direction. This tells me that it is likely the main spin field from that magnets blotch wall propelling the disc. The outer magnets throw an imbalance on it pushing one of the poles inwards while expanding the other pole. This throws an imbalanced spin on the blotch wall??? To do this does not require much power at all, very weak magnets probably and not enough to slow the discs motion from magnets grabbing.

i can't answer for Mylow's disk experience, but i sure can for my own. i know that the disk can move either way by changing the polarity of the stator(reversing it ) . It gains more momentum and travels further through each segment array when the rotor approaches the stator in repulsion- once it has traversed the preliminary repulsion and entered the gate it moves swiftly on it's own through the first array.

Conversely:
When the rotor approaches the array segment  in attraction it produces a noticeably weaker transaction with the stator and can usually not even make it through one complete array segment before stalling.  My magnets produce very little movement in attraction mode.

When the rotor approach to a segment array is repulsion the end of that array transaction will then be that the rotor is pulled back sometimes breaking free sometimes not .. depending on the length of the particular segment and how much momentum it has gained by traversing the array.
The rotor looses noticeable amounts of speed that was gained within the array movement .. after we have completed the array in the pullback phase of the transaction. i have noticed in the mylows videos that the pullback phase of his disk is less pronounced than in my own disk experiments and i have wondered why this is .. 

i assumed because his magnets were weaker but perhaps it is why you said .. the atomic moment accelerating the disk forward is more powerful than the magnetic force pulling back ..

Are his outer magnets all one pole facing inwards? This might explain such an effect. If the outer magnets are normal at least he is more aligned with the upper pole then the lower one hitting the aluminum.

Dave L

His magnets have both poles facing inwards ? ?
The south rotor face is glued to the disk .. the north is on top..
His stator's alignment is more favored towards  the top half of the channel rotors so favoured toward north.

Mylow starts his disk by pushing the rotor through the repulsion gate at the beginning of or in the middle of an array segment.

IF his disk really SPINS there are going to be a lot of people in the world who want to know how it's working ..

Thanks for your insights
Q

[chrisC]

i can't answer for Mylow's disk experience, but i sure can for my own. i know that the disk can move either way by changing the polarity of the stator(reversing it ) . It gains more momentum and travels further through each segment array when the rotor approaches the stator in repulsion- once it has traversed the preliminary repulsion and entered the gate it moves swiftly on it's own through the first array.

Conversely:
When the rotor approaches the array segment  in attraction it produces a noticeably weaker transaction with the stator and can usually not even make it through one complete array segment before stalling.  My magnets produce very little movement in attraction mode.

When the rotor approach to a segment array is repulsion the end of that array transaction will then be that the rotor is pulled back sometimes breaking free sometimes not .. depending on the length of the particular segment and how much momentum it has gained by traversing the array.
The rotor looses noticeable amounts of speed that was gained in the array movement .. after we have completed the array in the pullback phase of the transaction. i have noticed in the mylows videos that the pullback phase of his disk is less pronounced than in my own disk experiments and i have wondered why this is .. 

i assumed because his magnets were weaker but perhaps it is why you said .. the atomic moment is more powerful than the pull back of the magnet..

His magnets have both poles facing inwards ? ?
The south rotor face is glued to the disk .. the north is on top..
His stator's alignment is more favored towards  the top half of the channel rotors so favoured toward north.

Mylow starts his disk by pushing the rotor through the repulsion gate at the beginning of or in the middle of an array segment.

IF his disk really SPINS there are going to be a lot of people in the world who want to know how it's working ..

Thanks for your insights
Q

Thanks queue. Mylow's latest video does show the whole 8 magnets zipping right through.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JsEjdmPTQzc

cheers
chrisC

[joe_1001101]

Thanks queue. Mylow's latest video does show the whole 8 magnets zipping right through.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JsEjdmPTQzc

cheers
chrisC

More magnets in the following link zipping right through one section, but look at 15-18 seconds in the video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iLKiasJrN1s&feature=PlayList&p=4270206C13BC0BD6&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL&index=3

Mylow had the same problem in his last video as a lot of us have had. Bottom line:

No reason to start a whole new design when we "had" one that worked.  How crazy is this.  Why no video of the last working one a day or so ago, and why take it apart?

Come on.

But, if the 1 in a million chance hits "again", and he gets it running and replicated, then all is good!

Joe

[fleubis]

Thanks queue. Mylow's latest video does show the whole 8 magnets zipping right through.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JsEjdmPTQzc

cheers
chrisC

This latest video looks pretty good. Hope everyone caught that Mylow says both  "poles" of the stator magnet are the same. Some replicators seem to have assumed one N and one S, but Mylow says the stator is magnetized thru the thickness. This is what he demonstrated in his hold videos with the compass which many of us passed on as an anomaly.

[LightRider]

LightRider,

I am pretty sure those clicks are from a clock in the room.  The clicks are once a second. 

I have also had a clock on the wall that clicks louder when the second hand is doing most of the work traveling from around the  6:00 mark to 12:00 mark, then it is sort of quiet from 12 back to 6 as gravity helps the second hand down.  I guess it's just a coincidence the the speed changes as the clock becomes quiet.

Thanks,
Joe

Careful listening of 7 minutes of video #41b appears to show 5 times when there are "click" and they seem not consistent between each of them and not constant in the total time of 7 minutes ... the error is always something to consider... the conspiracy of the clock !
   
Thank you for your comment.
LightRider