Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim

[ellubpt]

I think the MYLOW saga brought the skepticism to itself.
The video was interesting, what started happening and what was said right after it was a cause for alarm.
Almost instantly, Sterling had a web page going started compiling "plans" for sale, structured income distribution. Then came the real tipoffs:
MIB's, the Joe Biden thing, crop circle refernces, Mylow talks to nature, refusal for anyone to witness it, the dramatic cemetary video.

Apparently his wife was part of the prank too, noting in this video clip that she saw "nothing hooked up to this thing".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PuVhO70aWpY&feature=channel_page

[Psyclone]

Interesting that jfhoss (newbie, 1 post) has been following all of this from the beginning yet he joined this forum on May 4th, 2009?  I guess he must mean he has been following all of this on Youtube since last year. ...

Without commenting on the rest of this, I'm just wondering why otherwise seemingly intellegent people make statements about "newbie" status, number of posts, etc. as if that means _anything_ significant to any particular discussion?

From a psycological point of view, I'm guessing that it has something to do with or related to a sense of "status within a community" and/or pack-mentality and/or assumed pecking-order within the group (or something).  Or (in some cases) maybe just general paranioa ("hmm... I bet that's so-n-so, using a new account!") - which may or may not be warranted in any particular instance.

Since I'm a "newbie" as well, does that mean I was born yesterday?  That I probably don't have anything usefull to add?  That I'm probably lying about whatever it is I do say?  That my opinions are less valid than someone with "hero" status?  Seriously?  ~ baffling ~

Just for the record, the first time I viewed an OverUnity.com web page was a week (10 days?) or so ago.  At which time, I spent time reading this entire forum/threads related to the Mylow project.  So while I admittedly don't know the entire on-going history (drama) of all the players involved on the entire site and various other projects (both valid and false-claims), I did follow this particular project for a week or so before signing up to post my observation of the "potential" motive (ie. the "Shiloh Prophecy"), because it seemed like the next logical step was to wonder "why" he was faking results and noone had yet mentioned that aspect at the time.

Anyway, I'm not claiming any particular expertise/knowledge on my part - as I mentioned in a previous post, I'm basically just a casual/interested observer - I'm just baffled whenever someone plays the "newbie" card to discredit someone (noone's done it to me here, but it's been done multiple times to others in this thread).

[TinselKoala]

@ TinselKoala

I guess it's time for an apology - sorry for my flaming.
I really thought this was the "real deal" - which obviously is not the case.
Sorry again and keep up your good research work (and of course your skeptical mind )!

Apology accepted. Thanks.

[nyctuber]

TK

From HJ, regarding the strength of poles and the Al bar experiment:

http://www.cheniere.org/books/HoJo/new_page_31.htm

[TinselKoala]

Do a control experiment.

Two magnets, each on a seperate piece of aluminum, opposite poles facing down.

Or, perhaps an even better control experiment, that addresses the issue raised, is to use copper compared to aluminum. Their magnetic properties are opposite: that is, one is diamagnetic and the other is paramagnetic. And copper is kind of special as far as magnetism goes, because of its electron shell structure.