Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim

Started by X00013, March 17, 2009, 06:27:33 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 42 Guests are viewing this topic.

Cloxxki

I say within 30 Days we've definately given up on fixed stator magnets, all replicating something FAR better :-)
@Dusty showed how a hand-held turning horse shoe magnet does miracles on rotor groups. He's going to time this action. If moving the horseshoe via a rotor-driven linkage costs less energy than the rotor is picking up from it, we have overunity. Much more realistic than a statis stator. Static, you just get to deal with (likely) evening out forces.
@rickoff over at energetic forums is doing something quite special and easily+cheaply replicatable. Mylow's setup, if they get overunity at all, will get low efficiency at best, and require crazy-specific magnet placement. more miss than hit. I'm quite convinced it can be made to work, but at the same time convinced a more complicated looking setup will end up being easier to replicated.

nyctuber

Quote from: Cloxxki on May 22, 2009, 05:00:05 AM
I say within 30 Days we've definately given up on fixed stator magnets, all replicating something FAR better :-)
@Dusty showed how a hand-held turning horse shoe magnet does miracles on rotor groups. He's going to time this action. If moving the horseshoe via a rotor-driven linkage costs less energy than the rotor is picking up from it, we have overunity. Much more realistic than a statis stator. Static, you just get to deal with (likely) evening out forces.
@rickoff over at energetic forums is doing something quite special and easily+cheaply replicatable. Mylow's setup, if they get overunity at all, will get low efficiency at best, and require crazy-specific magnet placement. more miss than hit. I'm quite convinced it can be made to work, but at the same time convinced a more complicated looking setup will end up being easier to replicated.

I don't get how Rickoff's setup is anything other than the most basic, nonsustaining magnet wheel. He moves the stator by hand (applied external force) when it hits the sticky spot and somehow thinks he can use the flywheel effect and rotor magnets to gain energy and make it run on it's own.

markdansie

Quote from: AquariuZ on May 22, 2009, 04:37:37 AM
TOLD YOU SO

But hey, who listens to crazy AquariuZ?

Lucky for me I can control my ego most of the time.

AZ

Not many,
however what did Mylow come back with....that he decieved us (notice he used plural saying video's) and he has another motor that is hand powered.
I think he might have got some good legal advice.

Cloxxki

Quote from: nyctuber on May 22, 2009, 05:09:34 AM
I don't get how Rickoff's setup is anything other than the most basic, nonsustaining magnet wheel. He moves the stator by hand (applied external force) when it hits the sticky spot and somehow thinks he can use the flywheel effect and rotor magnets to gain energy and make it run on it's own.
As I understand it, a tracking mechanism between rotor and stator arm will be put in place, making sure that for each individual magnet passing, the stator will be where it works best.
The idea seems to be that placing the stator will cost less work that the resulting rotor rotation will bring. Net: acceleration. I proposed a second rotor arm, connected directly with the former, to cancel out the forces released and required to place the stators where they need to go.
Rick's setup makes all kinds of sense to me. If this proves to not work, I'm likely to learn a lot from that failure.

Cloxxki

Quote from: nyctuber on May 22, 2009, 03:04:24 AM
The fishing line is visible in the videos before he clams he was harassed by 'MIB's' who made him 'fake it.' It's been a total scam since day one.
I am of the same understanding.
But, after supposedly failing for 30 years, perhaps Mylow still wants to believe. So firmly that he was hoping that multiple replication by smarter minds would eventually lead to HJ to be validated.

Mylow is welcome to work on that tiny disc what I'm concerned. Just don't post on it, and ship the inevitable "working" model to Stefan, and no-one less reputable. Both Hj and Mylow will get their deserved credit, and Mylow a job to help design motors from the now expired HJ patents.
I just don't see it actually happening with a static stator, not by Mylow at least. Why make it so hard on yourself? Moving stators are the way forward.