Resonnant circuits in cascade.

[thrival]

Elvis:

A resonant tank has got to be one of the cheapest experiments you can do, just two components. I would advise you do a
parallel resonant tank, reason being it uses very little input power at resonance. A series-resonant tank on the other hand,
uses LOTS of power at resonance. It will suck everything your mains can deliver and will probably blow fuses. Also, close to
resonance, isn't good enough. You need to be 'on the money' to log the effect. Also remember your components should be
sized big enough to handle "10 to 1,000X" your input, or parts may fry and/or go 'pop.'

A caduceus coil is a bit beyond the basic experiment. They don't behave like normal coils.

It's not that I don't understand ivory-towers. It's just that I find smug self-satisfaction, assertion of authority, inferred
omniscience, faulty logic... in falible and quite limited ...human beings, preposterous and disgusting. I'll be the first person to
admit I don't know everything. It's what makes my continuous capacity to learn, possible. Neither cyncism or belief have any
place in science, although from the point of sheer persistence and ultimate results, belief provides more gas to the hoped
destination. Opinions and elbows (everyone has 'em.) Peanut galleries don't have much constructive to contribute. A person
who doesn't know how to do a thing, has a right to their opinion, but not to be taken seriously.

[magnetoelastic]

I discovered something about Planck's constant: instead of E = hf, E = Pf where P = power in watts. It conclusively proves the how
and why of zero-point energy, and no, you will not be shown.

(sigh).  Your equation E=Pf does not contain Plancks constant, how can you assert that you can discover something about Plancks constant in an equation that has nothing to do with Plancks constant?

Back to Physics 101.  Energy = Joules, Power = watts = joules per second.  Frequency = cycles per second.
Power x Frequency = joule-cycles per second squared, NOTjoules.

This proves nothing about zero-point energy.

QED  -  NOT.

[magnetoelastic]

Has your party debunked the testatika? I'll bet not, since over 30 engineers visited the community and saw it run.

I find your definition of OU to be purist and anal.

When the testatika inventors publish a paper in a peer-reviewed journal, like Randell Mills, or publish a book describing theory of operation, like Joe Newman and T Henry Moray (for crying out loud!)  it will be easier to take seriously.

_Nature_ is purist and anal, to anthropomorphize.  F = MA, and there is no 'fuzzy physics'. (Except, perhaps, quantum mechanics).

[magnetoelastic]

To further drive the stake into the heart of the myth of Tesla's automobile, Tesla's nephew stated that they used a 70L7 tube in the power converter unit.  The car itself was supposedly assembled in 1931.

Trouble is, the 70L7 was not introduced until 1939.

Gosh!

[Elvis Oswald]

That would make his account embellished... if not totally made up.  damn!