New design working

[powercat]

@   DIDIT
Shortly when is shortly
z z z z z z z
cat

[ramset]

Oh Paul L probably Pm 'd him and told him we were all devils

Chet

[lostcauses10x]

We are still waiting it seems.

[johnfarmingdale]

DIDIT release the video, ok we are ready now!  release...

[starcruiser]

Can you please post a reference that contains proof of a working "over unity" machine that a University tested?  A claim is not proof.

The fact is, this forum alone has had the chance to do what you recommend, and nothing has come from it. Now it is time to get academic scientists a chance to see these machines first. DIDIT, you should be very careful. A University physics professor will not suppress your machine or harm you in any way. I would trust my life with a University physics professor over anyone here any time!

No University has suppressed an "over-unity" machine. If your machine appears to be obvious, then you have a good chance of having it analyzed. If your machine requires weeks to months of extensive highly sensitive measurements, then they may not take the time to analyze it. Any good University physics professor would do just about anything to be the first to verify a legit "over-unity" machine, but such a machine should be convincing from a glance. Again, I'll remind people that Universities are working hard to build the first Fusion machine, which could put oil companies out of business.

PL

@Paul,

From everything I have ever read relating OU devices and universities, they will never allow one of their professors to endorse anything that would be OU. If he tried to he would be either fired or would have to retract his statement. If you sent it to a university I would be willing to bet that the device would disappear and the University would claim they never received it or you would get a visit from the usual people.

You will never get an endorsement from any academic, their bosses will not allow it.

Nuff said.