Sjack Abeling Gravity Wheel and the Worlds first Weight Power Plant

[Omnibus]

@i_ron

Besides, I am not of the opinion the eisenficker's concept is
correct. The OD of the weight seems to be on the ramp and
not the axle for example and if the forces were correctly stated then there should be an RPM reading given so as to
indicate at what speed the readings were applicable.

That's incorrect. RPM's should have no bearing on the @eisenficker2000's torque analysis whatsoever.

We can imagine the wheel moving infinitely slowly, to avoid the talk about centrifugal or centripetal forces. The important, crucial conclusion is that the wheel will keep turning due to its own construction and the presence of gravity without spending any energy from a pre-existing energy reservoir. This is the revolutionary here. It's practical implementation is only a matter of proper, skillful I should say, engineering.

[i_ron]

@i_ron

That's incorrect. RPM's should have no bearing on the @eisenficker2000's torque analysis whatsoever.

snip

No, it is not incorrect, because then at a given RPM a whole
new set of factors appears as the weights, because they are
in motion change their weight. A proper simulation, or even calculation, has to account for this.

Ron

[Omnibus]

No, it is not incorrect, because then at a given RPM a whole
new set of factors appears as the weights, because they are
in motion change their weight. A proper simulation, or even calculation, has to account for this.

Ron

Like I said, RPM -> 0. The very fact, however that the wheel keeps on making full turns only because of its construction and the availability of gravity, at the expense of no pre-existing energy reservoir, has immense, far-reaching scientific consequences which is the most important aspect of this study.

[i_ron]

snip The very fact, however that the wheel keeps on making full turns only because of its construction and the availability of gravity, at the expense of no pre-existing energy reservoir, has immense, far-reaching scientific consequences which is the most important aspect of this study.

But omni, there is no evidence to support such extravagant
claims.

Ron

[LarryC]

But omni, there is no evidence to support such extravagant
claims.

Ron

Dang Ron, I hope you got your pee deflecting suit on, because you're surely pissing into the wind.

BTW Ron, the OB cheat sheet was brilliant, also liked Cloxxki's explanation of what a normal person would say.

Allthough, I'm sure it is all for nought, afterall OB is a genius in his own mind and no one will ever change that delusional opinion.

Regards, Larry