Sjack Abeling Gravity Wheel and the Worlds first Weight Power Plant

[i_ron]

snip
That was OB's response, do we have any others?

Regards, Larry

Hi Larry,

There seemed to be a lull in proceedings as the founder is
off with the mylow thing, Mondrasek and eisenficker are working out the correct way to measure the vecters and we await Dusty's  "working" model... that I became even more aware of the gross posts by ob.

I was really trying to determine what he was, I have my hunches...

But even though I am guilty of quoting his posts I will give
it a rest... I have made my point... so I wouldn't recommend
starting a collection...lol

Take Care,

Ron

"Never argue with an idiot... the onlooker might not be able
to tell the difference."
 

[Omnibus]

Hi Larry,

There seemed to be a lull in proceedings as the founder is
off with the mylow thing, Mondrasek and eisenficker are working out the correct way to measure the vecters and we await Dusty's  "working" model... that I became even more aware of the gross posts by ob.

I was really trying to determine what he was, I have my hunches...

But even though I am guilty of quoting his posts I will give
it a rest... I have made my point... so I wouldn't recommend
starting a collection...lol

Take Care,

Ron

"Never argue with an idiot... the onlooker might not be able
to tell the difference."

I said you don't get it but you arrogantly continue. @eisenficker2000 doesn't agree with Wmondrasek, let alone that @mondrasek himself understood his mistake. You don't get it. Hear it again.

[stgpcm]

What I said applies to you as well. Don't return to me what I said. It doesn't apply to me. I've given proof. You haven't.

the proof you've provided fails to determine what happens to the net torque.

Consider the simple system attached.

We follow your method, and calculate the torque for each weight, and we discover the system has a net torque of -1.

At this point you say this is a perpetuum mobile.

At this point, I apply the net torque to each weight in turn, and discover that applying that torque to the right weighthas no net effect, but applying it to the left sphere causes an equal and opposite force from the shelf someone inconsiderately left in the way. My revised figure for net torque is zero

[stgpcm]

I said you don't get it but you arrogantly continue. @eisenficker2000 doesn't agree with Wmondrasek, let alone that @mondrasek himself understood his mistake. You don't get it. Hear it again.

you're missing the bit where eisenficker2000 has admitted a mistake

[Omnibus]

you're missing the bit where eisenficker2000 has admitted a mistake

Where? Cite it?