Sjack Abeling Gravity Wheel and the Worlds first Weight Power Plant

[Omnibus]

Nope.  The method that I have been showing for calculating vectors and torque is correct.  WM2D is also correct.

See you around.

M.

I showed you directly your method is incorrect but you still insist it's correct. Stubbornness isn't a good adviser. As for wm2d, like I said, don't bother with it. You don't know what's really happening there. Unless, you want to hide behind such muddling. When everything is out in the open, as I've shown you, your understanding needs correcting.

[LarryC]

Nope.  The method that I have been showing for calculating vectors and torque is correct.  WM2D is also correct.

See you around.

M.

Okay, just a vote,

It seems that mondrasek is planning on leaving the thread. This would be a lost.

From my education,  mondrasek is correct and omnibus is wrong.

Would anybody else like to weight in on this issue?

Regards, Larry

 

[Omnibus]

Okay, just a vote,

It seems that mondrasek is planning on leaving the thread. This would be a lost.

From my education,  mondrasek is correct and omnibus is wrong.

Would anybody else like to weight in on this issue?

Regards, Larry

No. Truth in science isn't decided by voting. You don't know what you're talking but you like the fact that @mondrasek seems negative. That's a despicable behavior on your part.

If @mondrasek is too embarrassed and wants to leave the thread that's his prerogative. I don't think that he should be embarrassed at all because anyone can be wrong. Now he is wrong, at other time I might be wrong. That's the way search for the truth goes.

[Omnibus]

Now we know what we're looking for, after it is well understood that constructively there are no planes of obstruction. Guides are exactly what they are called -- guides -- serving only to redirect the motion of the weights.

Armed with that knowledge and the calculations made we now know that perpetuum mobile is real.

The only forces of obstruction are the forces of friction. These are variable forces, depending on the engineering skills of those who are attempting to make the device. These are specific problems whose successful solving is non-trivial may be beyond the reach of even the best constructor of traditional machines. Although, there's a reason why some Swiss watches are considered better than other Swiss watches, let alone from most watches produced in the world. Engineering secrets to make these champion watches are transferred from father to son and they are not at all a trivial matter. Otherwise everybody would make true Patek Philippes (not those fake ones sold in Battery Park by street vendors). I'm talking about watches because they are mechanical devices such the one at hand and not even touching on the microelectronics where the problems of making a high-end processor are beyond the reach of any individual family. No wonder why USA are the leaders in microprocessors and no matter how they try Japan, Korea, China can't reach the technological level set by the US. These are the realities of life and they are still more applicable to making a device which is viciously suppressed by the powers that be. Even developed countries cannot make a quality processor, the viciously suppressed perpetuum mobile is even harder to make with all the impediments, shunned from the proper infrastructure and so on.

All power to @Dusty and @eisenficker2000, though, and kudos to their brave efforts. We're all waiting to hear from them about their success, and if not, that will only confirm what I said above and in no way will indicate that such a machine cannot be made.

[LarryC]

No. Truth in science isn't decided by voting. You don't know what you're talking but you like the fact that @mondrasek seems negative. That's a despicable behavior on your part.

If @mondrasek is too embarrassed and wants to leave the thread that's his prerogative. I don't think that he should be embarrassed at all because anyone can be wrong. Now he is wrong, at other time I might be wrong. That's the way search for the truth goes.

No, I never said anything about mondrasek being negative. Despicable behavior, what drugs are you taking?

I am only looking for others with an education is this area that could give an opinion to gain a consensus about the argument. This would certainly eliminate any opinion from you as it has always been Omnibus's way or the highway.

Regards, Larry