MylowHJ Replication - Discussion

[AB Hammer]

Cloxxki

Once you are in patent pending status. It is time to shout it from the mountain tops.

You said
>>It takes one kind of original thinking to get to inventions, and another to use them for your personal gain.<<

No one can do it alone. So you pick your friends and partners carefully. They have all already been picked. For when the time comes.

[DHCP]

TK is doing real science, that is the skeptical part of science. It is obvious that a lot of people will waste time and  money on something that science says is not possible. What would you say to TK then?
I love science and mylow is demeaning it.

Is the whole point of this forum not about unconventional science? If you want possible science you are on the wrong forum, are you not?

[Cloxxki]

I agree. The sceptical science in this field has been completed.
Big inventions were made by chance, or by looking past the horizon of the known.

It would at this stage be more productive (until Mylow finally allows someone to investigate his working motors) to find out which priciples could be used to obtain a result like Mylow's, rather than to tinker with rundown graphs and comparing them with his. If Mylow's magnets when grouped act as a group, you can't expect individual magnets to behave as such in specific places.

If Mylow should turn out to not quite have it yet, conventional science will not help this cause any further. If was given a chance for centuries. Some free thinkers with expertise in this field, when cooperating efficiently, can in a short time accomplish a lot.

[Bobbotov]

Is the whole point of this forum not about unconventional science? If you want possible science you are on the wrong forum, are you not?

Well, it could be like an unconventional parachute. You know, it doesn't open.

[utilitarian]

Is the whole point of this forum not about unconventional science? If you want possible science you are on the wrong forum, are you not?

Is unconventional science where you can discard the scientific method, and proclaim something as true based on "feelings?"  If that is the case, you cannot call it science at all.  It is pseudoscience.

The essence of scientific research, however bleeding edge, is the rigorous scientific method.  You have to challenge every new claim until it can withstand all attacks.  I don't know why people don't get that.