MylowHJ Replication - Discussion

[vonwolf]

For the sake of argument...lets say its a fake.

But what if some boob believed it is real...tried to replicate it, and kade a mistake which led to the real thing?

But what if he became discouraged by the nay-sayers ?

This is why I wish people would just sit back and let life unfold naturally.

Please allow people the room for unfettered discourse.

I believe we all can agree that one thing always leads to another...lets try allowing some time and space for these leads to fully develop.

Thanks.

Regards...

    Well I have to agree with the Cap here. folks are making more noise about this than the "2000 mile spaceship" that was coming last October.

    I have seen it posted over and over "A PMM is not imposable" {even though it's not a PMM} I thought thats what every one here was striving for.

    Just on the slim chance this was not a fake I know I wouldn't go thru this BS.

     Just a Thought Pete

[BEP]

@AB

Do you hear the buzzing yet? It seems that dung heap is drying out.

[dingbat]

To both Mylow threads:
I have posted a second video about my Johnson/Mylow replication trials. including the preliminary conclusion that no overunity could be found with the setup I have used (70 cm zinc plated disc with 6x7 rows of  6 magnet elements stacked, double skateboard ball bearings in pvc pipe).
Whether Mylow cheated it or not, what is important is to remember that something cheated does not mean that something is wrong. With different considerations and configurations it still might work. When Mylow cheated, Johnson is not necessarily a cheater. Just like with Brady's Johnson cloned Perendev product. So replications are still worthwhile.

AA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XG_WNheWfHM

I made a device too.  I had similar results and came to the same conclusion.  I don't think that this arrangement has any potential to "work".  It was a good experiment, and I gained from it.

[markdansie]

he is back

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iJ4Qk7Hnu1Q

[TinselKoala]

I saw a YT video that says that 3 + 3 = 8.
I found this to be completely in line with my theories of integer cloning.
So I tried to  replicate. Here's a page from my lab book.

3 + 3 = 8.

er....

3 + 2 + 1 = 8.

hmm.

1 + 5 + 1 = 8.
Making progress!!

5 + 1 + 1 = 8.

Grr. dammit.

6 + 1 = 8.
5 + 2 = 8.

Let's try a different approach.

9 - 2 = 8.
9 - 3 = 8.
9 - 4 = 8.

9 - 1 = 8 !!! Success!

We need more replicators!!

(coffee spilled here, a blood stain, further data missing--a page torn out...Hmmm.....success, suppression!!!)