MylowHJ Replication - Discussion

[slapper]

Thank you wattsup. As always; your courage and enthusiasm is inspiring.

@captbuck

I''m copying over a post I made from the other thread:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=7039.msg166106#msg166106

ACH79 Channel magnet Alnico 5 magnetized with two poles
100pcs $1.28 each plus one time charge for tooling of $175.00 6-8 week delivery

They have 2 other similar magnets in stock for immediate delivery:
0.280 X 0.370 X 0.750 Channel magnet Alnico 5 magnetized with two poles; 100 pcs $1.38 each
0.380 X 0.370 X 0.840 Channel magnet Alnico 5 magnetized with two poles; 100 pcs $1.48 each
They both have 0.125 hole in the middle.

The following image is the fax they sent me.

Take care.

nap

[Omnibus]

@queue,

I'm still curious about this suck-in-spit-out business within an individual cluster I mentioned couple of times. I don't think it can be tested when the rim is complete in your case because it very well may be that the magnets you're using are too strong and the clusters cooperate and don't act as isolated islands. As I mentioned before, what we need in principle is a hybrid between the magnetic propulsor and the tri-gate. My hope was that Mylow's may be such a hybrid and I'm still not satisfied w/ the outcome until I clearly see that it isn't. I wonder if you intend to do more work with your contraption. If not I'll be very happy if you could send it to me (at my expense) for, say, a week to do some experiments with it. Alternatively, if you think it's appropriate I can come up to you in Montreal. As for my own rig, I don't know when the magnets will arrive and the cutting of the Al disk which I'm planning to do only after that will take even more time. I was thinking, there are available constructions already to carry out this simple test. One of them is yours, which is the closest to me, and I thought maybe it wouldn't be a bad idea to mention this to you.

[Michelinho]

Hi everyone,

Good move for the thread wattsup.

Here are a few observations that might or not help.

The disk when it starts running becomes a Faraday disk. So it is very much influenced by the surrounding magnetic field of the Earth and all the electromagnetic pollution added.

The other is harder to imagine since it is based on a drawing in "The Electrical Experimenter" but don't recall the month or year of publication. The drawing shows the relation Earth/Moon by enclosing Earth in an offset "U" shape or horseshoe magnet and the Moon spins around it always showing the same face.

The third far fetched idea comes from Boyd Bushman "celt" stone as the mode of propulsion is the counter rotating force.

Take care everyone,

Michel

P.S.: If the MIB were to threaten my family, I TOO WOULD DECLARE MY RESEARCH A FAKE WITHOUT HESITATION. Think about it.

I hope it can help anyone working on this project.

[hansvonlieven]

G'day all,

As most of you know I have always been suspicious of the Mylow device. The attempt at replication that did impress me was the Queue replication. There is definite movement there from cluster to cluster.

Having said this, I strongly suspect there will be problems as he attempts to close the circle as it were.

Perhaps there is a way around it. I propose to split the system in two and have them operate in tandem. Below is an illustration of what I mean.

I have drawn the two disks side by side, though in a real motor they would probably sit on the same shaft one above the other.

Something to think about perhaps.

Hans von Lieven

[Michelinho]

Hi everyone,

@ Hans, it looks a lot more like Tesla's homopolar generator with 2 disks (bifilar homopolar generator) where the disks are coupled by their circumferences with a conductive belt.

One thing that is so big that I did not see (and was told) and I have to share. Howard Johnson's Stonehenge motor does not rotate a disk but it rotates the stator as in Mylow's and Queue's replications. He also uses both ends repulsive force (1 magnet structure at each end of the arm) to achieve this. Maybe something interesting would be seen as rotational speed and stability of rotation.

Take care,

Michel


Edit: Each time we deviate from the original, we add complexity and difficulties.