Where the extra energy comes from according to the ECE Unified Field Theory

[AquariuZ]

Everything spins & There is no free energy, only abundant energy.

I will not lie to you: I have no clue what I am posting but that is ok.

There are so many knowledgable individuals on this forum that hopefully someone will appreciate the pointers.

I have just uploaded a paper by Prof. Myron W. Evans, co-author of the Einstein-Cartan-Evans (ECE) Unified Field Theory which I think (even with my limited knowledge) is relevant to this forum.

This paper explains the effects seen in the Bendini motor and where the "extra" energy comes from using the parameters of the ECE Theory. It is certainly not directed at the untrained eye.

I came across the ECE theory by checking out a Hungarian Company called Gamma Manager Kft in Budapest, who are producing commercial generators which use the ECE theory as a scientific basis.

Abstract

Spin connection resonance (SCR) is used to explain theoretically why devices
in electrical engineering can use the properties of space-time to induce voltage.
Einstein Cartan Evans (ECE) theory has shown why classical electrodynamics
is a theory of general relativity in which covariant derivatives are used with the
spin connection playing a central role. These concepts are applied to a device
known as the Bedini machine.
Keywords: Spin connection resonance, electrodynamics in general relativity,
Einstein Cartan Evans theory, Bedini machine.

The paper on Bendini is available here:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=tpmod;dl=get270

The ECE study site is here:
http://aias.us

The thread on Gamma Manager Kft and their EBM generators is here:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=7338.0

The Gamma Manager website is here:
http://gammamanager.com

The link between the EBM machines and the ECE Theory is made on their blog here:
http://gammamanager.blogspot.com/

I apologise for being a gnat buzzing in your ears, but I must insist that anyone with a scientific background at least glances at this.

My interpretation of all this data (it is not information because I do not fully grasp it all) is that when proven, it changes the foundations of physics as we know it.

Please discuss the mentioned ECE Bendini paper or ECE Theory in general if you can.

I am hoping to see the ECE Theory get its own section in here because it has a profound effect in understanding the "energy from the vacuum" effect as discussed by Tom Bearden and many others. I have just requested Stefan to open a discussion section for this theory.

AZ

[Michelinho]

Hi AquariuZ,

Check also this one on negative energy by Hotson:

http://www.zeitlin.net/OpenSETI/Docs/HotsonPart1.pdf

http://www.zeitlin.net/OpenSETI/Docs/HotsonPart2.pdf

Take care,

Michel

[gravityblock]

Hi AquariuZ,

Check also this one on negative energy by Hotson:

http://www.zeitlin.net/OpenSETI/Docs/HotsonPart1.pdf

http://www.zeitlin.net/OpenSETI/Docs/HotsonPart2.pdf

Take care,

Michel

This sounds like negative energy to me also, as you pointed out.  Loner is correct also in saying the negative and positive energy needs to be separated in order to have over unity.  This negative energy is responsible for cold electricity, while the positive energy is responsible for the hot electricity we are all familiar with.  The negative energy is located in the magnetic field in the middle of both poles which form a vortex and is said to be a negative time flux field, while the positive energy is the forward time field. Space time is, in a manner, short circuited.

I'm attaching a picture that explains it all, assuming it is correct.

[Michelinho]

Hi gravityblock,

Throughout the 19th and early 20th century, negative energy has had many names and many researchers; Ed Leedskalnin's two opposing currents, Dr. Felix Ehrenhaft's magnetic currents, Tesla's radiant energy, Tom Bearden with energy from the vacuum, Hendershot, Morray, Sweet,  Bedini and dozen of others. What is funny, they all found out ways to get to this negative energy and all have in common ways of getting it without force (except for Bedini). When you start using force to get energy, you only get the positive energy by compressing or pushing against the negative energy and I believe that you get the negative energy by using expansion, putting it in motion in a way still unclear and letting it flow after. We may need to convert it somehow to see it flow but one thing is for sure, it surrounds us ready to be tapped in.

The TPU is a good example as you start the flow and it feeds itself (even to destruction if not controlled). Bedini seems to use the compression to set the expansion in motion but kills it soon after and start over again and again. Not efficient but it works somehow a little.

The search is on, the game is afoot.

Take care,

Michel

[khabe]

We can find huge lot of amazing things from Nature,
http://www.metacafe.com/watch/2628499/super_chameleon/
Life itself  is amazing!
Have you met any perpetuum mobile in Nature? - No!  - emphasized for people who are still busy with gravity wheels and selfrunning waterwheels,
Overunities? - yes - at least very close to ... meny super efficent phenomenons like most of living beings, like birds ... or like the Man himself (normal Man I meant
Real overunity, hopefully, will come when some still undiscovered source will be discovered in reality - not just in opuses of soi-disant academicians
Some new type of radiation ... what ever. I do believe that this kind of new energy could not be fished with naive coils and capacitators even when added few semiconductors or vacuum tube
Existing sources like Sun and Wind  are most common sources for Overunities for normal people today.
with due respect,
khabe