Cold Electricity

[ouguru4u]

Very nice coil you have in the Magnetic Resonance youtube video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQSowLrufs0&feature=channel

Can you provide instructions for that coil design?

Thanks!

[Bob Smith]

I think this is the link to Tesla's schematic (had to condense spaces and change commas to periods in link given on YT video):
http://www.tfcbooks.com/tesla/nt_on_ac.htm#35
Looking forward to hearing more about this one.

@Magnethos - great intro to CE. I'm anxious to see your summary when you've made it available.
Regards,
Bob

[Magnethos]

@Bob
The problem is making one or another energy system is that people want to build a working device. But the question is no that, the question is "How energy really works".

We know that classical electromagnetics theory is incomplete. But a lot of people is still trying to do a vacuum energy extractor using electromagnetism. Reading the Ohm's law and thinking by yourself, you can think that anything is missed in the classic theory.

The planet earth is an inmense reservoir of static energy, but people say that "they need amperes". Amperes are the system losses in form of heat. But you can demostrate this with Ohm's Law with very simple experiments.

If people are looking for more amperage, they are looking for more losses.
And you need to remember that anyone cannot have gains in a system based on losses.

[Bob Smith]

The problem is making one or another energy system is that people want to build a working device. But the question is no that, the question is "How energy really works".

We know that classical electromagnetics theory is incomplete. But a lot of people is still trying to do a vacuum energy extractor using electromagnetism. Reading the Ohm's law and thinking by yourself, you can think that anything is missed in the classic theory.

The planet earth is an inmense reservoir of static energy, but people say that "they need amperes". Amperes are the system losses in form of heat. But you can demostrate this with Ohm's Law with very simple experiments.

If people are looking for more amperage, they are looking for more losses.
And you need to remember that anyone cannot have gains in a system based on losses.

@ Magnethos,
Thanks for your feedback - I am in complete agreement.

We are indeed enmeshed in a system designed to produce losses, that generates a profit for those who manufacture and maintain its antequated and inefficient technologies.

I agree with you, that we need to approach this problem with a new paradigm that describes the true working of electricity. Standard textbooks have given us a very incomplete and misleading picture.  Most people I've spoken to arrogantly assert that there is simply no other way of understanding electricity.

I believe the solution is for us to continue sharing our progress and insights as we  uncover systems which tap into the sea of energy surrounding us.

I look forward to reading more of your thoughts on this subject.

[Magnethos]

@ Magnethos,
Thanks for your feedback - I am in complete agreement.

We are indeed enmeshed in a system designed to produce losses, that generates a profit for those who manufacture and maintain its antequated and inefficient technologies.

I agree with you, that we need to approach this problem with a new paradigm that describes the true working of electricity. Standard textbooks have given us a very incomplete and misleading picture.  Most people I've spoken to arrogantly assert that there is simply no other way of understanding electricity.

I believe the solution is for us to continue sharing our progress and insights as we  uncover systems which tap into the sea of energy surrounding us.

I look forward to reading more of your thoughts on this subject.

Don't worry about that, most people will say you "that is impossible!". Of course, each one is freely to choose his thoughts. Some will say you that because they're educated in a way that they don't accept to look at pseudoscientific science, other will admit that could be true but they don't want to believe in that thing, etc...

I met a man here in the country I live, that has invented a free energy device in the 1960s. He also invented a wireless telephone and an electrotherapeutic device. A lot of people from around the world have met him (including nasa and ford) and some people have said that his machine is impossible and he need to be using some nuclear battery to do that.
So, there are some people that, seeing with their own eyes a free energy device, they don't believe in that things.

The man told us that he learnt those thing experimenting day and night (he says that he cannot sleep). In the newspapers he has in his wall, I read that "I have a very good books, but no one explains the things I know." also, there is a quote that says "All the classical books would be burnt to understand the machine". So, he wants to say that classical theory is incomplete. Usually the people that have built some free energy devices, say that.