Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Cold Electricity

Started by gravityblock, April 30, 2009, 01:11:26 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

quarktoo

Sigma16, Here are some thoughts on electricity and free energy. You may be one of the few around here that could understand it.

I found a paper relating to our PM's on this subject earlier today - I may have given you this paper in the past but it explains why the current appears in the core.  I didn't bring this up as I have over 10MB of science papers on my computer and was not sure I would be able to find this one.

The emission people call cold electricity is the splatter that occurs during the initiation of AB effect in the FE when the particle pieces clap back together. The particle is slapped back together with the speed and pressure of the universe and is where acceleration / cavitation / electron cascade takes place. (BETA emission) It is also what creates voltage and moves it at the speed of light.

While the mass or larger quarks are still probably present and reform, their mass is reduced and proof of that is action at a distance. You can't have it without mass in between.

The image below is the last page, do you have this paper? NOTE the orange outlined area. I don't want to upload the paper since I may have purchased it and it is copyrighted. PM me an email and I will send you my copy. I think I alluded to the AB effect in an early post on this cold electricity subject.

Understanding that AB effect opens the door to understanding electricity itself which most have no clue about and is often referred to as a phenomenon. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrical_phenomena

Below is reason that I make the claim that electricity itself is mass to atomic energy conversion. Accelerate it to the next higher order and OU is possible. What is an order? Electrons flow down a copper wire at less than 1 meter per minute. E=MC2 is the equation. Move that electron at just under two meters per minute and you get to roughly square the energy output.

When you stop and think about it, you would need a particle smaller than an electron to shield a spin curl wave since the aether vortex is made of particles much smaller than an electron and can easily slip between the atoms that make up the shield regardless of the size of the atom or length of the lattice chains.

Now take that a step further and ask yourself does AB effect and associated spin curl occur on the surface of conductors as well as inductors and does that account for the right thumb rule? Me thinks it does and explains current at a nice simple level. Ironic that half a spin curl wave looks exactly like a current in a river isn't it?

A spin curl is really two waves like two tornadoes tip to tip - one north negative and one south positive. (Look at a black hole photo from Hubble)  If you assume that one side of the spin curl dips into the wire and the other side is above the surface, then that would explain why a superconductor works. Since the metal's lattice is very dense, half the wave can't sink into the conductor and so the charge carrier flows freely on the surface and no friction is produced. It also explains right thumb rule for current flow.

The reason that the spin curl is not persistent on a non-superconducting conductor is one side of the wave is below the surface of the copper and is instantly destroyed upon cessation of voltage flow and you can't have a ying without a yang.

I will add to that that reason the spin curl develops is that all mass is spinning. When you divide a particle which is what AB effect is, the two halves will never be equal in their new spin rate, velocity, direction or size. Due to the gravity and magnetic fields of the particle pieces and the fact that they fit together like a lock and key they come back together on the other side of the dividing particle.

Now since they are not spinning equally they need time to sync and reform, this is what produces the persistence. It is also the reason that it is said that all quarks or pieces of a quark have a unique personality.

However, just like throwing a snowball at the blade of a knife, some of that snowball will stick to the knife and some of it will splatter. The splatter is cold electricity but it is not being formed using AB effect per se in an arc, it is being done through fusion in an electrical arc. If your body becomes the FE core, and your blood is filled with iron, the iron in your blood becomes the dividing magnetic particle of the core and you just got electrocuted at a cellular level.

Voltage and current flow speed - Voltage is caused by the two parts slapping back together at the pressure of the universe with is the speed of light. Current flow is less than 1 meter per minute due to spin curl persistence. Until the particle reforms, it is not going anywhere in a hurry. Since it can't be well shielded this also means that the magnet also can't have much action on it at a distance.

Now take that and have a look at the double slit experiment. Suddenly every behavior of that experiment is explainable and predictable and the subject of quantum science is relegated to the trash can. Quarks are quarks and it matters not if they are electrons, photons, etc.

Static electricity - Just little pieces of particles that have a balanced or weak magnetic charge. I think of it as quantum dust. You can recombine the pieces back into heavier particles using a magnet - see methernitha. Note that the two halves of the coils are connected at the top. The reverse of AB effect? Notice how the Methernitha state that the static is recirculated around the device to make the current heavier? :)

Sparks claimed that their was 1 ma of current in a 1st orbit electron. I suspect that number flawed  but have not done the math yet. I tried to get him to do part of it for me to no avail. F'ing worthless homo Wilby went and pissed everyone off.

Anyway - those are the high points and things like Aether, spin curl, current direction, current and voltage speed all start to make sense. Oh yeah.. the fuel source and conversion of true OU free energy devices too.

Hope that post is understandable. It is the first time I have shared that info. or tried to put it into words. Look at the original AB experiment for better understanding. I played with the experiment 10 years ago after stumbling across a paper of AB effect. (Electron stream, two reflectors, brass mesh, solonoid coil, wedge shaped magnet)

The info. is way over most peoples heads and those that could understand it would have to let go of a bunch of belief that they paid lots of money to get in college. Finding people smart or sane enough to discuss it is difficult so I have always kept it to myself.

Conversely, if I try and discuss this type of info. on a physics forum, I get banned by the educated magical thinkers because nobody has told them it is OK to believe this information through peer review. Peer review is all about suppression. So I am stuck, living in reality mostly alone but that beats the hell out of the alternative of being one of them any day!

The sane persons thought filter:
1.Knowledge is experience.
2. There are things that I know and things that I do not know.
3. I don't know what I don't know.

Use the mathematical law of probability to derive truth. When so many pieces begin to fit, it is probably true.

The experiments have been done. The devices have been invented and built. The science papers have been written and peer reviewed by some of the smartest people in history like David Bohm and Maxwell. All you have to do is connect the dots.

People like Wilby are so focused on hiding their insecurity they don't know that there are dots out there to connect and they are not here to do that anyway. He is here to false try and affirm to himself he is not an insecure moron. A lifetime of hyperfocus on his hiding his insecurity meant he missed learning a whole bunch of things out here in reality.

It is a character flaw that occurs when it matters more to him what other people think of him than he does of himself even though he uses deception to attempt to fool others. The problem is that the only people he fools are other people like him. That is what produces the mob mentality that stupid people exhibit and the reason they will gang up on others in packs. It is all based in insecurity. Got tiny man junk?

sparks

     The only law I see that appears to remain in tact is the conservation of inertia.  I just dont see mass in motion suddenly altering its mass in motion parameters without conveyance of something to other mass in motion.  We really dont have to go messing around with the weak and strong particle binding forces to warm up a cup of coffee or air in an engine.  By the same token we dont have to contiously repeat the same chemical reactions over and over and over again exploiting natural rescources.  There are a whole shitload of processes which can exploit "ionizing" frequencies.  I have also gained the ability to take low frequency and changing it into higher frequency.  Quite high.  It was quite simple I pulled a flyback transformer out of a TV and the xrays magically appeared from a 60hertz scource.  I also pulled the tube out of a fleamarket microwave and although not recognized as an ionizing frequency is enough to get some interesting results turning water into a highly excited state which again appeared to be emitting secondary ionizing frequencies.  As far as I know there is no regulations regarding the use of flyback transformers and magnetrons to ionize gases.  And I dont feel it is necessary to go much beyond the classical model of the atom to proove where the extra juice is coming from.  And I wont be writing a paper for any peer review because I really dont give a fuck about these peoples opinions.    I dont know at what level of ionizing frequency generation the atomic regulatory authorities (can you imagine a group of people that are running around saying who can and who can not use atoms ???)  fines and or imprisons you for such action but I am sure there is a law regulation or mandate by one group or another governing the use of modified sunshine to heat coffee and air.  These deadly ionizing frequencies that can cause all sorts of dna gene mutations are generated in every mitochondria in every cell of our bodies and every oxidation process known to man but they are licensed for use now by people that own the electromagnetic wave spectrum in order that taxes be paid and other forms of tribute to the people that bought the electromagnetic wave spectrum from the electromagnetic wave spectrum vendors.  Well Im rambling but in the Bohr model the electron appears to have some orbital momentum.  This orbital momentum in a 1s orbital is the equivalent of one milliamp.  I dont know how many newtons because I am more an electrician than a wieghts and measure guy.  "Conductors" pretty much suck at being milliamp scources as their electron clouds mask the electron buzz saws in the lower orbitals.  Hydrogen on the other hand is not hampered by an over abundance of electron fog.  When hydrogen 1s orbital electrons are ionized this milliamp of current can be used to generate ionizing frequencies.  These ionizing frequencies you guessed it ionize more hydrogen and pretty soon things warm up.  At the expense of other things  the parent atoms the ones that are heavy and old cool down.  They are lighter but colder.  Why are they colder because they dont have a milliamp of induction current heating them.  These ions can be made to go up while the electrons are made to deaccelerate at various rates into a host of materials including aluminum foils various gasses all sorts of end user devices like lightbulbs heating elements electric motor coils all of which operate at low frequency high current.  The inertia of the electrons in the donar mass is converted to the inertia of the electrons in the fucking wire that disrupts the magnetic field that makes such magical effects as magnetic induction.  The motion in one system is induced in the motion of a second system.  A child could understand it in fact my child understood it and brought me a plasma lamp and said Dad I think this has the right gas in it. 
Think Legacy
A spark gap is cold cold cold
Space is a hot hot liquid
Spread the Love

ramset



                                 Gemtlemen
                                    Quote:
                  "A child could understand it "
                        ---------------------
                                Thank you!


Whats for yah ne're go bye yah
Thanks Grandma

sigma16

Quote from: quarktoo on September 09, 2010, 12:59:47 AM
Sigma16, Here are some thoughts on electricity and free energy. You may be one of the few around here that could understand it.

Got it. Thanks much.

Everyone is familiar with the equation F=ma, but ask them to determine the kinetic energy of an accelerating mass and watch their forehead wrinkle.  We are taught to think in terms of forces, not energy (potential or kinetic).





quarktoo

F-MA only works until you accelerate the mass, then it no longer applies. Until all "laws" of physics have a C2 function where applicable, we are never going to have anything accurate or relative.

Maybe it should have been written F=MA2