magnetic propulsion, is simple.

[nitinnun]

in magnetism,
repel is stronger than attract.


so if the positive and negative poles of a rotor magnet,
are both pressed against the positive pole of stator magnet,
than the rotor magnet will move !

move in only one direction.
in whatever direction the rotors positive pole,
is facing.

because the rotors positive,
is repelling harder against the stators positive,
than the rotors negative,
is attracting towards the stators positive.




the stronger the magnetic field/s,
the harder/faster the rotor spins.

because if you have 20 pounds of force moving to the right,
and 10 pounds of force moving to the left,
you have a net movement of 10 pounds of force to the right.

the 10 pounds of force to the right,
wins the tug of war.

and the 10 pounds of force to the left,
can just shut up and take it.

you do not need to have mono-pole magnets,
when one half of the magnet/capacitor,
is stronger than the other half of the magnet/capacitor.




once you have imagined it, it is very simple.
it is "why didn't i think of that!" simple.

but first, you must have imagination, to conceive of it.

which is why not everyone is convinced,
without first seeing a physical demonstration, in person.



lizards have little imagination.

lizards insist on having chunks of meat, hand fed too them.
as if the owner is their servant, and the lizard is royalty.

i think of people with little imagination,
who demand that inventions be physically shown to them,
before they will even consider the invention intellectually,
to be lizards.


royal lizards......

[FreeEnergy]

oh you mean the Maglev Technology?

see http://pegasus.cc.ucf.edu/~pzanwar/portfolio/maglev_finalreport.pdf

[gravityblock]

I drew a quick illustration to make sure we're on the same page.

Imagine the stator repels the rotor magnet and the rotor moves clockwise.  Now, when the rotor magnet goes around and nears the stator magnet again, the force that previously repelled it clockwise, will now repel it with the same amount of force counter-clockwise, assuming it is even able to break free from the attraction before and after this counter force.

Let me know if my drawing is correct or not.

Thanks,

GB

[d3adp00l]

first, you claim the repel is stronger than attaction, Sorry but I refute that claim, and every magnet I have seen refutes your claim.

If a magnet will exert 10lbs pull on iron then 10 + 10 (pull plus pull) =20lbs, and if you put 20lbs of force pushing to like poles together they will touch.

Secondly, your claim that people who require an invention before they consider it an invention to be lizards, well thoughs are fun, but it doesn't power a damned thing. So build it if its so easy otherwise it doesn't exist except in your imagination, which is of very little use to the world.

Just build it.

[Ergo]

in magnetism,
repel is stronger than attract.

Your'e so fuc----ing wrong about magnetism.
You can't just imagine the real world to behave as you wish for in your mind.

The real world fact (isolated from your mind).
Repulsion is always weaker than attraction. This is pure facts.
Have a close look at the attached calculation picture on a couple
of N48 magnets at size 4x2x1" placed 0.25" away from each other.
http://www.magnetsales.com/Design/Calc_filles/PullAndPushBetween2RectMagnets.asp

As clearly seen the attraction force is 352.3 lb but repulsion is only 210.3 lb.
So this idea of yours that repulsion is stronger than attraction is completely BS.

Please don't spread false data. It's so annoying and destroying.