High volume gas production at 12,6 Volts and 10mA !

[Ros-Co.]

Hi!

Thanx

I tried to produce an arc underwater, but I can' still it.  Only a very short arc produced (I think the water cool the plasma too fast)
I tried it with a Microwave Oven Transformer (MOT)  (2100V, 0,4A)  but the water has too low resistance, and overload a transformer, so it is not produce underwater arc.

I'll try your idea with tungsten rods.  Maybe distilled water produce less ohmic losses.  Or an insulator needed round the electrodes.

On plasma electrolisis, tungsten rods easily damaged (lower melt point metals more) I have an idea to eliminate it.  (It was Tesla's idea)

Why not splash out 2 water jet from a rotating disc, in 90 degree?  Water jets crosses, and produces arc.  There are NO corrosive electrodes.
Power level easily increased, but no electrodes.

In egaspower setup, a high voltage arc under water produce plasma, or trigger, and after, a much lower voltage (and much larger current) arc discharged across the electrodes.  The energy stored in elko about 100x than the trigger energy.  Maybe this setup produces a few centimetres long discharge under water.  I think it produces a very big explosion.

[Tink]

Howdy Ros-Co,

You need low Voltage and high Amperage (just like in welding).
Have a look at this page of Naudin's site:
http://jlnlabs.imars.com/bingofuel/html/aquagen.htm
And this selfrunner:
http://jlnlabs.imars.com/bingofuel/html/bfr5hpgen.htm

(EDIT) Sorry my remark is off topic and has nothing to do with your experiment
I should have read the complete thread which I did not, sorry again.

[hartiberlin]

Hi!

Thanx

I tried to produce an arc underwater, but I can' still it.  Only a very short arc produced (I think the water cool the plasma too fast)
I tried it with a Microwave Oven Transformer (MOT)  (2100V, 0,4A)  but the water has too low resistance, and overload a transformer, so it is not produce underwater arc.

You should better try with a low voltage welding transformer which
has big amperes !

Why not splash out 2 water jet from a rotating disc, in 90 degree?  Water jets crosses, and produces arc.  There are NO corrosive electrodes.
Power level easily increased, but no electrodes.

This is a very good idea, but the goal was an arc under water
to get , so one could use it to
burn also old plants and gras and bio waste products with it,
which could be put into the
water and get burned also and produce with the Water H2 and CO gas
for powering generators...
So how could you catch the H2 and CO gases, when you burn
the water-biowaste solution by streaming 2 streams of them together and
they just meet in the air ?
You would probably need to do this in a metallic tank somehow to
catch the gases at the top...
But as these are burnable, it would be a risk of explosion..
So how could you get these charged water streams to buildup an arc under water ?
Any idea ?

[Ros-Co.]

In my experiment, the underwater arc not produce hidrogen, because it burns out immediately. A device produces great amount of heat. (as in Jnaudin's experiment)

But explosion is possible in the chamber...

[hartiberlin]

We have to find a way to produce plasma under
water with no consumptions of electrodes and
mix with the water biowaste products and thus
produce these Aquafuel or Bingofuel gases,
mainly a mix of H2 and CO gases.
This would be the ultimate goal to have such a process
running without consuming electrodes and low power input and produce
burnable gases which can drive a motor-generator.