Mylow Motor was a fake

[vonwolf]

Do you not understand sarcasm when you see it?

    Thanks HeairBear I was beginning to think it was just me.?  No wait I know I know its just mylos clever use of obfuscation to throw us off the track.

    @wattsup;
I will ask all members including the silent majority who agrees with me to send @stefan a PM, only one each, stating only one sentence "I WANT MY OVERUNITY.COM FORUM BACK".

Or if you do not agree with me, send him a PM stating "PLEASE BAN WATTSUP". Then whatever the majority will say, I will be ready to leave this forum for good. lol

     I agree with you %100 its ridiculous how many times some people keep hammering Mylow saying the same thing over and over again.  As I'v said many time it's getting old.

    I know I have no juce here so I don't think I'll PM Steffan, I hope this helps

   Pete

[RunningBare]

I'll state it in public, please do NOT ban wattsup, why?, because you are entitled to your opinion just as others are, but certainly I believe your moderator status should be removed because once again you have shown bias, it is not the job of a moderator to to influence bias but to remain impartial, the job of a moderator is to moderate, if that means banning someone then so be it, but with clear warning sent to the offending user and a copy to the site owner.

I will ask all members including the silent majority who agrees with me to send @stefan a PM, only one each, stating only one sentence "I WANT MY OVERUNITY.COM FORUM BACK".

Or if you do not agree with me, send him a PM stating "PLEASE BAN WATTSUP". Then whatever the majority will say, I will be ready to leave this forum for good. lol

[nyctuber]

Thanks for the unnecessary personal attack, wattsup.

As per your instructions to me about Mylow, you should put yourself on a short leash.

Btw I was right about Mylow at the time of my 'attacks.'

[mscoffman]

First;

I want to thank all of the people who put in time
computer analysis of Mylow's videos...This was a very
impressive effort! I hate to say this but you were right!

I want to point out that;

a) Mylow apparently impeached himself several times
in e-mail communication starting with communications
with Paul-R, whom I believe.

In that 'Court' program on TV as soon as any
witness starts to impreach themselves the judge
recognizes this immediately and begins to rule against
them. Why didn't you begin to discredit Mylow
when he did this.

b)Mylow had problems with basic engineering
terminology as in how to do certain things
at first. This should have been a clue that
the guy was motivated in a way that technologist
people would not understand...Including, questions
of his basic sanity. I do recommend that Mylow
get a CAT Computerized Axial Tomographic
Brain Scan by the way. They may be surprised at
what they find.

c) I was extremely disappointed that he or (they)
implicated politicoes in any sort of scheme as
politicians already have an *Extremely* bad record
on energy understanding, planning and legislation.

Next

I do think that Sterling Allan does not get away unscathed.
I was impressed (disappointed) by the rather large number
of topic headings generated for Mylow's discovery even
though nothing had been proved.

Sterling has to take responsibility for creating
a circus atmosphere that "THAT HAS BEEN THE
HISTORY OF THIS FIELD."

Sterlign; "This stuff is about what nature does"
"THIS IS NOT ABOUT BELIEF - IT IS NOT RELIGION"
"Nature doesn't give a damn about what people think
or what they know! Take that T.B."

:S:MarkSCoffman

[TinselKoala]

Ban Wattsup? Of course not. He owes me a beer! If you ban him I'll never collect.

But I believe he is unnecessarily critical of those 2 posters he mentioned specifically, which is unfair IMHO, as these 2 individuals, while perhaps relatively new to this forum, bring valuable information and set an excellent example.
LC10x is an old hand at magnetism and magnet motors. Read his stuff carefully and think about it well and deeply before you write it off. I do.
Nyctuber evaluates evidence and makes up his mind based on what he sees. When he sees something different, he has no qualms about abandoning his previous position and changing his stance. Some might criticise him for this but I see it as a good example of how we need to be able to let our pet theories go if the evidence, even the LEAST evidence, contradicts it...as long as the data is good.

(But Watts, man--in the future if I say I "can" do something (as opposed to "I might be able to do it"), would you please just take my word for it?     )