Ricks Pipe Dream

[AquariuZ]

Then it was someone else. Wasn't meant as an insult.

Can you stop deforming Rick´s character and ridiculing his setup please?

This thread is for serous comments, not vile speculation.

Your comments are driving serious people away. Do it again, and I will report you to the moderators of this forum with a request to have your comments removed.

Please note I am asking nicely.

AZ

[AquariuZ]

Chet, I think you need a new forum.  The only thing offered here is stupidity and extreme negativity.  Sure, if you're going to be up this way you are welcome to drop by, check out my machine, and see firsthand exactly what's going on.  I'll be adding my flywheel later today, and will try to post a video sometime tonight or tomorrow showing the spin test as a comparison to video 16.  The builder's pdf file is ready, and I'll be sending you a link to download that.  I'd appreciate it if you don't make the pdf available to any of the unworthy pencil necks here who continually spout off negative comments while having no idea whatsoever about the topic of discussion.  Blanket statements such as "it can't work," or "attraction and repulsion forces cancel each other out" have no merit in the discussion of the working principles of my device.  My methods take full advantage of both the attraction forces and the repulsion forces.  They do not cancel each other out.  Instead, they work additively.  My machine self-starts from a standstill, and quickly accellerates the first magnet group using attraction.  At the tail end of the group the stator is almost effortlessly moved just a small amount to repel the rotor magnet group into further accelleration.  These two accellerative forces, seen as each rotor group nears and then passes by the stator, are strong and continuous as long as timing is maintained.  It should be obvious that such forces are capable of doing a certain amount of work besides spinning the wheel.  I can borrow some of that energy and apply it towards moving the stator.  I can also tap the inertial energy stored in my flywheel, which will be substantial.  I concede it is possible that I may fail in my first attempt at obtaining proper MOSTAT travel utilizing my tracking system, and without causing drag that will eventually slow the wheel to a standstill, but so what?  Would that mean that I must give up?  I don't think so!

Best regards to you,

Rick   

Hi Rick, please do not take notice of idiots like nyctuber.

There are a lot of serious testers and researchers in here.

I for one love what you are doing...

All the best,

AZ

[ezzob]

Yep, Pull is bigger then repulsion.

http://www.magnetsales.com/Design/Calc_filles/PullAndPushBetween2RectMagnets.asp

[TinselKoala]

Rick, could you please perform and post some simple control experiments with your rig?

Yours is really easy to test properly. All you have to do is to figure out a system that is repeatable to bring your wheel from the "valley" into the starting position.

There are at least 2 ways to do this: 1) use a weight of just enough weight, and a string wrapped around the axle or periphery of the wheel, as I have shown in some of my testing vids, or 2) run the wheel up to a known measured rpm; and in both cases time the rundown or count the turns or provide some objective measurement of performance.

Then compare the performance of your wheel, WITH and WITHOUT the stator (s) mounted. This procedure will tell you if your wheel is really "working" in any sense that matters.

I'm asking you nicely, to perform the very most basic experiment. It might take you all of half an hour to perform 5 rundowns in each condition.

I'll even offer to pay you your regular salary or wage rate, for the time it takes for you to set up and perform this set of experiments, because I know that one can't expect to get something for nothing.
Sincerely,
--TK

[rickoff]

Then it was someone else. Wasn't meant as an insult.

Yes, what you have been spouting was definitely meant as an insult.  For example - comparing me, and my work, to "BIG Fat Pothead."  I'm not amused, and I don't think that any other serious and knowledgeable researcher would be either.  If you folks want to have a meaningful forum then you need to open your minds to new ideas and possibilities.  Don't be so quick to condemn people or their ideas.  Step back a moment and see if maybe you can learn something from what is being discussed.  There's no way that you can persuade me to believe that my attempts are futile, and why would you even hope that they will be?  Aren't all of you folks here in a search for free energy?  And what are you doing to move that search forwards?  Blatant and unbridled negativity,  and ridicule of others, won't get you there.  If you want to prove that this device will not do what I say and show that it will then you must build it to prove me wrong.  Just remember that when you spout off a bunch of nonsense it will most surely come back around to make you look rather foolish.  So choose your words carefully, be polite, and be certain that what you state is factual.

Rick