got over the sticky spot

[hartiberlin]

Just press the REPLY button and attach it in the lower attachment form,
which searches it on your harddrive. Many thanks.

P.S: Don?t use the Quick Reply window !

[Omnibus]

?It would roll a large steel ball up the ramp but no matter how big of an SMOT that I built, I could never get the steel ball to a point that was higher then what it started.?

How is it that the steel ball rolled up the ramp and it never got higher than when it started?

?But, I know what you are thinking, "but there is horizontal movement, that must be proof of energy being produced" I tested that hypothesis too.?

No, this is not what I?m thinking. I?m thinking that the ball goes up the ramp, as you say, therefore its potential energy becomes higher spontaneously, without you spending work for that increase.

?And it worked, it extracted some energy, but guess what else? The more energy I took from the ball on it's way up the ramp, the lower a point the ball had to end up at on the exit in order to escape the magnetic field at the end of the ramp.?

So what? As I explained before, you can place the ball beneath the device (this we?ll call the ball?s ?initial position?) then you?ll spend energy to lift it to the input of the device. Then the device will spontaneously lift the ball up the ramp, thus spontaneously endowing it with an additional energy. Finally, the ball will reach the end of the ramp, will fall under the action of its own weight to its "initial position? at which it will recover the energy you spent and will produce as ?present? excess energy ? the energy it was endowed with while the magnetic field was spontaneously pulling it up the ramp.

?All an SMOT is, is a fancy way to move a ball from a higher point to a lower point.?

On the contrary, you said yourself that the SMOT moves the ball up the ramp, that is from a lower point to a higher point.

?If an SMOT really produced excess energy of any kind then the ball would exit the ramp at a height that was equal to or higher then it's starting point.?

SMOT does exactly that.

Thus, based on your experience, which you just shared, not mine, SMOT does produce excess energy.

[Omnibus]

hartiberlin, here's the video ...

[hartiberlin]

SMOT ramps to my experience must be built at least 50 cms or longer so you could get at least
10 cms or higher height difference and can get a rollaway when the ball just falls only less than 10 cm down.
ALso you have to "design" the exit point with lots of asymmentrical iron cores so you distort the fields
there to have a real near ZERO fluxdensity field there.
You just build it very big to see the effects.

But please let?s us concentrate onto Scott?s motor in this topic.
If you want to discuss the SMOT, please add your posting to the SMOT postings.
Thanks.
Regards, Stefan.

P.S: Thanks for uploading his first video.
It seems he had brushed off a corner of magnet to make a triangular magnet.

[Omnibus]

hartiberlin, I take Scott's design as a practical application of a SMOT principle, for continuously producing of excess energy. That SMOT produces excess energy periodically is beyond any doubt, as I explained.