New TPU build

[giantkiller]

The simulation does not show BEMF. If you have it then you have no kick. If any part of the pulse goes below ground then the kick is nulled. It is delicate. Nature abhors a vacuum. Class AB amplifier would be a good example of this negating this process. You'll notice the height of the kick in the previous simulation because there is no negative part.
Podkletnov: CEMF effect allows the recoil to null the kick effect. The kick is to propel the standing wave incrementally forward from the source to the destination of farther out, increasing the radius. The Searl device holds the standing wave at bay because of the mechanical distance rotors fron the stators. Podkletnov and Brown sent the standing wave away at incredible distances and speed.
Look at the kick like the return reading of a metal detector. 

The first rotovertor has the generator side by side or dual parallel axis and this configuration works beautifully. The reconfiguration on the same axis has a preponderance of tuning issues. Any takers?

If this info is not in line or spec with this thread then many apologies.

--Ji'an K'ylar.

[Farrah Day]

BACK EMF vs CEMF confusion!

I always thought that CEMF was exactly the same as BEMF. When I was at college in England we used the term BEMF - never CEMF. I assumed CEMF was simply the Americanized way of saying the same thing, because of the use of the word 'counter'. In America they would say counter-clockwise, in England we would say anti-clockwise... or backwards.

I see some people are claiming that BEMF and CEMF are two different things, but if you check it out, most people/websites seem to think it is a different way of saying the same thing.  Is this not the case?

In any case, what simulation are you refering to GK?

[starcruiser]

Seems like someone is finally catching on. TPU = Motionless induction motor/generator.

Single oscillator, phase shifted to drive a 3 phase stator (control Coils) with a rotor/pickup (collector).

Using multiple control coils/stator coils, one on top of the other (sound familar Farraday?) to increase output field, use more collectors to collect more of the field. simple induction and generator theory.

very simple to do really.

Have fun, be careful.

[BEP]

For clarity's sake please Wiki CEMF and Back-EMF.
They are certainly different. I didn't see the term 'BEMF' until I started to use the web for this work. CEMF should be found in any electical tech manual written in English and probably most translations.

In any case, know the difference and don't let others confuse you because most don't know the difference.

[Farrah Day]

BEP

Did that, but Wiki would seem to be the only reference to the two being different things. Like I said, at college in England (ok, it was a few years ago now) I never even encountered the term CEMF - our inductor theory talked only about BEMF.

The fact that you hadn't heard the term BEMF until you started to use the web does rather tend to indicate it is a language issue rather than a distinctly different phenomenon.

However, I do feel we need to clarify this point. Can you provide another reference other than Wiki?  A single reference could be wrong and is not really acceptable. The majority of websites talk about the two terms as if they are a different way of saying the same thing. Wiki would seem to be in the minority.

http://www.newton.dep.anl.gov/askasci/phy00/phy00351.htm

http://ayyarao.blog.co.in/files/2008/07/notes-8.pdf

http://campus.murraystate.edu/tsm/tsm118/Ch7/Ch7_4/Ch7_4.htm

I personally think we are simply using different terms to describe the same thing.