Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Rosemary,

For your circuit it would seem that the goal was to generate more heat with less input energy, and that's the reason an inductive resistor was chosen for the experiment. Am I right?

Really, if one wanted to extract free energy in the form of electricity, using an inductive resistor is surely NOT the way to go. Winding an inductor with heavy magnet wire until the DC series resistance equals 10 Ohms will produce an inductor with a relatively high inductance to resistance ratio, and will then have much less losses in heat. This would be much more suitable for attempting to extract free electricity as opposed to free heat I would think.

So, I think everyone needs to pause for a moment and first decide what form of energy they are trying to produce, heat or electricity (or in another form magnetism)?

.99

Poynt - this is my understanding.

I take it that the quantum paper experiment cannot be duplicated on Spice.  Before now I never realised this.  Presumably this is because of some constraint related to evaluating the performance of inductance from a load resistor?  I simply wanted to see what difference in performance between Spice and the actual quantum experiment.  Then I wanted to see the performance of Spice on Aaron's published test at low wattage and at a net negative discharge from the battery.  That way we could discover if this scenario is classically predictable(edit) and how far off the actual experimentally measured values.  It seems both are fraught.

But it also seems that Harvey's requirement is also difficult on spice.  He wants to see the load at full saturation?  You can't get to saturation without an increase in the duty cycle?  I can't advise you regarding Harvey's requirement.  I thought a reduction to the Ohm's value might get you there.  Apparently not.  But I think Harvey is, indeed, trying to evaluate the quantum published experiment.  And frankly I'd prefer you to do what he requires.

I must say I thought it was as simple as putting in the required parameters of the circuit and then hitting an instruction to 'run' - or something like that.  I never realised that it all took so long.  Sorry Poynt.  Ignore my own requests here.  But it would be nice if you could be proactive in settling Harvey's question. 

And again, thanks for the time spent on this. 

[poynt99]

Rosemary,

I have done everything asked thus far, including the Quantum article setup. SPICE is doing everything correctly as per conventional analysis. Unless I am mis-interpreting Harvey's requirements, he's off on a bit of a tangent, or not quite understanding how the circuit works. Clearly as I've shown at EF, pulsing the inductance to full saturation is not going to give him equal negative excursion time.

I await his further instruction. And if there's something I've missed that you would like to see from any of the plots and circuits I've shown, just let me know.

.99

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Golly Poynt.  I've missed all if you've already done this.  Where do I look.  or better still how difficult to repost? Choose either option.  I'm quite excited.  Do your presentations come with some sort of power analysis?  I have difficulty interpreting this from waveforms.  Data on vbatt - vload and vshunt would be perfect.

Many thanks Poynty - much obliged.

[poynt99]

At EF, there are 2 posts:
#2527 (Actually labeled "Load, Drain, and Battery Power with Quantum Circuit")
#2537 (Driving the Quantum circuit at 454.5kHz)

Monitoring the battery voltage in a simulation is not useful as it is steady unless a small series resistance is inserted, which I have done. Still, I don't think it will give you much useful information.

Vload and Vshunt is no problem. I will give you VDrain as well, because Vload would be across the load.

I'll make another post to cover this off.

.99

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Many thanks indeed Poynt.  EDIT Just add VBatt.  Ta muchly