Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Hi BEP.     Thanks for the reply.  I am intrigued that you are so familiar with this test.  We're discussing von Grusenick on Energetic Forum and I took the liberty of quoting you.  I do hope this is in order. 

Now that I'm more familiar with the coriolis effect - indeed I think there may be some relationship.  But I'm not sure why the 'spaceborn tests' need to rotate.  Surely the fact that gravity is a spin wave is an assumption?  My own take is that the gravitational fields are smooth until they bend/ flex around gross mass.

And, frankly, I'm rather comforted that you're the victim of the inquisition.  It puts you on 'team hopeful' which is definitely my side of the argument. I'm also heartened to find that there's an ellipse at 45 degrees.  It's sort of grist to the mill for my own eccentric viewpoints. 

I would love to know how you manage to spend your time on such interesting work.  And I would really like to see you do your own version of this test.  Actually I'm in awe that anyone can put such apparatus together.  Such skill.  It blows me away.       

[poynt99]

Hi Poynt.  It seems we're going to keep you on this side of the argument?      I'll answer your last question if you'll first answer mine?  I think that's fair.

Are you referring to Harvey's simulation?

If so, please be specific. In general, it has shown nothing I have not already shown in my own simulation exercises I did at yours and Harv's requests.

.99

[Rosemary Ainslie]

  Hi Poynt.  I did want you to tell us about Harvey's simulation.  But actually I'll retract my question because I realise it may be painful to refer to his scoop.  So I won't ask you to mention the fact that he found an aperiodic waveform    or that he tested all options to find the rquired capacitance for the timer circuit.    Nor will I ask you to reference the fact that he managed the even timing effect between the charge and the discharge of the inductor.  And, while I'm on the subject, I would also then spare you the need to refer to his actively exploring the 'negative cycle'.  So.  It's official, I'll retract my question.

Notwithstanding which - let me answer your own.  I was pointing out that the Tektronix TDS 3054C is vastly superior to other oscilloscopes and, while I'm at it, it is ideally suited to the required measurements of Fuzzy's tests.  And again, thank you Lisa for the loan.   

[poynt99]

Wow! 

Is that really you Rose? It sure doesn't sound like you. Sounds more like something Aaron would banter on about....quite a disappointment I must say, to see you stoop to this new low. It's quite out of character?

I (and I suspect MH and a few others may too) detect an air of insecurity about that post. Discounting my oscilloscope and the results it will show already, and I haven't even got started yet LOL.

Pretty low indeed Rose, if in fact that is you. I expect such nonsense from your followers, but I thought you were above this? 

I would gladly indulge you in explaining all your misconceptions and drivel being fed to you by your followers about the simulation and the scope, but I think we both know that would be a waste of my time.

Please do try to do better "Rose"...we have codes of conduct here too you know. 

.99

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Hi Poynt.  You're making me feel guilty.    Allow me a little smug gloating - it's so, so rare that I get a turn at this.  And I know you're strong enough to take it.

Since we're sharing the same territory here - maybe we could really communicate. 

EDIT ?