Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[poynt99]

I love this guy..he's a phenom:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6lbvSBNLLoo

Plenty of other videos out there too...search "Tommy Emmanuel".

.99

[Rosemary Ainslie]

  Poynt and MileHigh. Definitely a mood swing here.  Thanks guys.   Both were great

EDIT.  POYNT  if you're still there - PLEASE???  We need you to post those pictures.  And you're ignoring me again

[poynt99]

Poynt.  You're amazing.  I need to know how Spice managed that initial reversal?  Is it graduated during oscillation?  Or does it just do what you tell it?

Rose, it requires some insight, but it was not that difficult. I simulated the output section of the 555 timer chip and used that to drive the "MOSFET". I included the heavy current limiting resistance that Fuzzy and Aaron used on the 555 VCC pin. The 555 output section is what is responsible for that "reversal", when heavily "limited" with that series resistance in VCC. If the guys had scoped the MOSFET gate, they would have seen this.

Please post on Energetic forum.  I want Harvey to see it and he never takes his excursions here.  If I can swallow my pride surely you can???   

EDIT Here's a post preface.  "On urgent application - I'm showing Fuzzy's waveforms."

Thanks for the positive feedback Rose. The hostility I'm receiving at EF is becoming a bit too much.
You can post a link there to the post I made with the scope shots. Copy and paste this in:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=7620.msg202337#msg202337

.99

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Ok MileHigh.  My thesis, for what it's worth claims that energy delivered by a supply source returns to the supply source.  In tact.  Energy dissipated at a resistive load comes from the structure of the load resistor itself and can result in the degradation of the material of the load resistor.   The proposal is that the bound state of any amalgam is the result - not only of the atomic or molecular structure of the atoms, but of fields of magnetic dipoles that 'belong' to the atom.  But they are extraneous to the atom.  They are too small and too fast and too cold and too balanced to be detected.  These dipoles arrange the atomic and/or molecular structures in a position of zero net charge.  If they cannot get to that 'rest' state - then they look to extraneous fields to move through.  They can't just 're-arrange' their spin.  They need to re-arrange their position in space to change that spin.  Just like a magnet has to move the entire body to change it's spin.  Circuit components allow this 'passage'.  We know of it as electric current flow.

If these imbalanced fields reach the negative terminal they present an alternate charge.  Then they can slot back in - do their stuff - but having an alternate spin they introduce the balance required to reach that 'rest state'.  That's when the potential difference changes to neutral.  By doing this they change the position of the atomic/molecular bonding that also changes the 'charge' of that source amalgam.  That early imbalance is measured as potential difference or voltage.  This then changes from a positive or a negative to a neutral.  That's the 'immutable imperative' that these dipoles move to.  A position of zero net charge.

Here's an easier example.  Take a log of wood.  The assumption is that, like all amalgams, the wood is bound by these fields.  They orbit the molecules and atoms of the wood.  Then apply friction to form a 'spark'.  Now you've broken the symmetry of that orbit.  The dipoles lose their small, fast, cold state and manifest into a big, slow, hot state.  That's the spark.  This first 'break' sets off a chain reaction so that more and more fields unravel.  The dipoles still retain their magnetic nature.  They move together.  The spark becomes a flame and the flame burns until - all things being equal - no binding fields are left.  All that remains are the atoms that originally comprised the log of wood.

The question then is where did the flames go?  They expended their energy - precisely equal to the energy required in the first instance to generate that wood.  Some decay back into the magnetic fields of the earth, by slotting in.  Some peel off as photons.  Some find gaseous atoms, such as oxygen and bond them together with carbon.  Some carbon atoms simply blow away.  Other gases may escape from the wood.  But all the dipoles are dispersed away from the inital amalgam.  That wood, that amalgam has now lost it's bound condition. 

Now.  Put the flame under a cauldron containing - let us say - iron filings.  Some of these particles disperse into that cauldron - passing through the body of the cauldron itself and disperse into the filings.  And being magnetic they move through the filings, and then around the filings until their heat disperses the iron atoms.  Then when no more dipoles are available the fire goes out.  The dipoles interact with each other and with the atoms until the dispersion of 'charge' is equal - or best as can be achieved with imbalanced valence condition of iron - and then they systematically lose their hot, slow, visible state to become cold, fast and invisible.  And because they are magnetic fields - they remain undetected.  Yet they bind the loose filings into an indetifiable amalgam.

That's a painfully inadequate description to some of the background or the 'thesis' - if such it is.   

So.  My model does very well when battery voltage stays the same or increases.  And it is substantially proven with a 'negative' net loss from the battery.  This woud not be COP greater than anything at all.  It is actually over unity.  So indeed.  I do not subscribe to your 'classical' viewpoint.  And - I'm a little bit excited at the results that have been shown by Fuzzy and by Aaron.  Actually that's not true.  I'm more than a little excited.  In fact I'm stratospheric .     I'm up there with you.  But with a different 'anticipation'.     So you see where you put me when you give yet another rendition of physics according to mainstream. 

EDIT  And since you explained yours I think I should also have a shot at trying to explain mine.   

[MileHigh]

Rosemary:

I read through it once, an sort of caught your drift, I will try reading it a few more times.  Let me just make a few general comments.

You can think in terms of electrical energy and heat energy and chemical energy.  There are some fairly simple analogies that some to mind.

For the heat energy, you can imagine the amalgam of the ceramic in the resistor like a bunch of billiard balls in a three dimensional random matrix.  They all stay in their respective "courts" and continuously smash into each other in a random fashion, and this goes on forever as long as you are above zero degrees Kelvin.  How rapid and violent the continuous smashing is is a function of the temperature.  The key thing is that these are "ideal" billiard balls that undergo what are known as "perfectly elastic collisions" with their neighbours where no energy is lost when there is a collision.  That's basically what heat is.

For chemical energy, now you start to think of the individual billiard balls as having their own innate stored energy, that is normally kept stored but has a potential to be released.  You know the little triangular thing that you made with five Popsicle sticks as a kid?  You started off with a triangular shaped arrangement of three Popsicle sticks and then slipped two Popsicle sticks across them to make an arrangement of sticks that held together under it's own stress.  When you threw it and it broke apart on landing, it "exploded" releasing the stored up energy.

The burning wood is just molecular "triangles" breaking apart and adding more energy to the heat billiard ball game described above.  When a chemical reaction takes place, two molecules might eventually become two new molecules that fly away from each other at high speed - and they crash into the billiard ball matrix and add more bouncing energy into the mix, raising the temperature.

The electrical energy being converted into heat energy is simply moving electrons converting their electron-volts of energy into heat energy by smashing into the random matrix of the continuously colliding billiard balls.

That's a simplified view of what I see going on at a microscopic level.  All of the energy action is mostly mechanical in nature - that's what heat really is.  Burning wood is just the billiard ball game going completely haywire, the amalgam, a.k.a. the random matrix gets broken apart by the extra shaking going on and the "triangles" start exploding everywere.  Some of the solid amalgam changes in "phase" from solid to liquid, and from liquid to gas.

Oops, I should also mention that photons are swimming around in this billiard ball game matrix soup also, and when the triangles start popping, photons start getting emitted like crazy, sometimes smashing into billiard balls and "disappearing" or sometimes making their way out of the amalgam.  This is the EM energy radiated away from the amalgam.

MileHigh