Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Hello MileHigh.  What a relief to wake up to such a mild post.  You see how significantly you feature in my life? Mr MilesMoreImportantThanYouRealise.

The extra gravity thing is actually simple.  It was discovered near the turn of the century by - forget who - who saw that the galaxial mass and spin was such that the star systems should peel off and away.   Instead of which they stay bound.  The fact contradicted the mathematical prediction - apparently.  But I don't know the math.

But I'm in full agreement with you that there are only 4 forces.  It's my proposal that magnetic underpins all.  I work on the hypothesis that all the other forces - including the 'strong', 'weak', 'gravitational' and 'electromagnetic' are just varying manifestations of a magnetic force.  I could prove it as explained, because my only other proof is the reconciliation of the mass/size ratio of the proton to the electron.  Widely considered to be a 'non event'.  Still.  It's the best I can do within the constraints of my limited abilities.

Looks like an auspicious start to a really nice day.  And don't get too relaxed with Poynt's analysis on the 'negative before positive' number.  It still needs to be answered.  If you really need brownie points - MH - I'll give you loads.   

Poynt.  Please check your skype messages  and answer me.  And I'm really, really sorry for the momentary lapse into 'tease mode'.   
I thought you'd laugh.  Clearly lacking in insight here. 

EDIT  - The need for extra gravity was discovered by Hubble.  The genius.

[MileHigh]

Rosemary:

I watched a PBS documentary about dark matter about five years ago.  I assume that you know what the US Public Broadcasting System is all about.  My retention for facts is much different nowadays and I can't soak up everything like a sponge like I used to.

Yes, Edwin Hubble discovered that the universe is expanding in the 1920's with the red Doppler shift he observed with his spectrographs.  They probably could not resolve galaxies to the point of looking at the delta Doppler shift from either side of the galaxy's axis at that time.  It seems to me that the discovery that galaxies are rotating faster than they should be is relatively recent, perhaps in the last 20 years, but I am really not sure.  They look at edge-on galaxies and look at the red and "blue" shifts on either side and crunch the numbers and find that they are rotating faster than their estimated mass by observing the "light matter."  Therefore they assume that there is unobservable mass - the "dark matter" that accounts for the increased spin rate.

Then there is a relatively new theory about super-massive Black Holes at the centers of galaxies accounting for all the extra mass.  It truly is an ultra exciting time to be in the field of astronomy.

I can't remember the discovery date for the "missing mass" even though I watched a documentary on the whole matter in deep fascination not too long ago.  What the hey!  I could Google it and forget it again.  lol

Anyway, just content to be waiting...

MileHigh

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Hello MileHigh.  The need for 'more gravity' than evident predates the 2nd world war and maybe even the first.  But I'm too tired to look it up.  It's just that it filtered through to general knowledge REALLY SLOWLY.  It's still an embarrassment to mainstream.

And the problem - the actual mathematical discrepancies - between apparent and expected - was, I think, pointed out by Hubble.  Not sure if he was the first but suspect this as he had the best means to 'look'. 

[MileHigh]

When the magnetic field collapses on the load and has the strong negative spike, that sharp gradient breaks the symmetry of the vacuum and acts as a sink that pulls in more potential with it, more than what was put into the coil to charge it to begin with. Strong gradients show effects that are known to violate thermodynamics. It may be debatable as to why, but it is not debatable as to whether or not it happens, in my opinion.

Don't we all wish.  Aaron has the technology to prove this for himself one way or the other, who needs to debate.  There is no breaking of the symmetry of anything.  v = L di/dt explains the voltage.  The equivalent current spike from a capacitor, i = C dv/dt gets the short end of the stick and gets no attention.  Look up "derivatives" to learn more.  That's where you don't add or multiply variables together, rather, you add or multiply rates of change of variables together.

And the magic is in the material that the resistive load is made of. I deduced that from my early tests and mentioned to Peter that it appears that if the spike is directed only back into the coil - without it going to the battery, it converts the voltage to current.

Do you think that Aaron can back that statement up with a reasonable explanation and some paramaters or variables?  I don't.

I actually don't even understand what he is saying - how can the spike be directed back into the coil if the coil itself is generating the spike?

There is no "conversion of voltage into current" - the discharge from an inductor will start at a initial current and then slowly or rapidly decrease down to zero.  How fast it depletes down to zero is dependent on the load.  The higher the load resistance the faster the discharge and the higher the voltage.  In that sense it is more appropriate to consider it like current being "converted" into voltage, but I wince at using that language.

It is all about a discharge of stored energy, where the current starts at an initial current and drops to zero, and the voltage can vary from near-zero to a very high voltage, enough to breakdown the dielectric strength of air.

Anyone that wants to play with coils has to understand this.  There are a million web pages in the Naked City.

I thought that was worth repeating, what the heck!

MileHigh

[poynt99]

Another from Aaron's latest post:

Actually, I can even remove ALL 4 CAPS and the timer circuit still runs, the load still goes negative and the load waveform is still mirrored on top and bottom with periods of remaining a net negative dc on the load.

What he's just admitted is similar to what I explained about the 555's operation in this funky mode. It's using the internal and stray breadboard capacitance for its timing capacitors, while almost completely bypassing the internal output section. The 555 was not designed to operate this "fast" nor in this mode, and I'm surprised that it can get into oscillation at all.

Also, note the statement of "periods of net negative DC on the load". I'll have something to add to this in an upcoming video.

.99