Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Hi Poynt.  Neat photo - neat set up.  And well done for that waveform replication.  I forgot you also use Tektronix. For a while there I thought I was just looking at a repost of Fuzzy's waveform.  Well done.  Clearly there's not much you can't do with that programme. 

Anyway.  I'll leave you to deal with the double negative.  Just know I'm getting an increasing respect for your skills here.

[MileHigh]

Hi Rosemary:

It was fun looking at the waveforms and revisiting the thermal analysis.

Just to be a nerd and comment on the DSO dumps:  You can't forget to do the two probe compensation steps first before you record.  For the DSO waveform dumps you could copy that into the "raw data dump" tab in your spreadsheet.  Then on another tab on your spreadsheet you could make a generic 5000 row number cruncher.  All that you would have to do is copy/paste a range of data that represents one or two or more complete cycles of the 555 timer period.  This just requires attention be paid to the waveform on the display and it's period and relating that back to your raw data dump to copy/paste 'N' complete cycles.

One cell would hold the precise measurement for the shunt resistor value.  The output from the spreadsheet would be the average battery power being consumed by the circuit.  Then compare that to the thermal power and calculate the COP.  YOU only need basic spreadsheet skills to do this.

I probably missed some other stuff along the way.  Also, by the way I was watching a few more Marko Rodin clips.  Not looking good at all.  He and Jamie do some clips that are feigning creating a magnetic monopole with a Rodin coil and a drill bit using a North/South hand-held indicator gizmo as "proof."  This is not true and it has been rebutted in the comments everywhere, yet Jamie's and Marko's clips remain up.  Marko says he needs funds to do his own "open-ended" research without being answerable to anybody.  I am not aware of his "mathematics" solving any existing mathematical problems that are either in the "Top 10" list or still remain unsolved.  Marko says he needs money to "build a space ship" and in a daring moment of sheer balsyness says, "I can make a black hole."

Translation:  He is looking for a meal ticket now that he has built up an "aura" about himself and is a lot older, and he got lucky and stumbled upon Jamie.  He wants to milk his schtick and make a career out of the "Rodin coil fantasy."  A "Bearden" in the making.

Poor Jamie knows next to nothing about electronics and physics but he is smelling something green himself.

What a downer, eh!  lol

Oh yeah, personally if i was doing the testing I would put off any battery rundown testing until after Glen's DSO was returned.  As I said before, to do run-down testing properly would be real work.  Measuring voltages only is simply wrong, it's nonsense data.

MileHigh

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Hello MileHigh  - I see you're regressing into a MilesMoreObjectionableThanYouEverThoughtPossible.     The truth is probably that you're trying to pretend that you're not still over the moon with that resistor arrangement.  So.  I'll indulge you.   

I'm still waiting to hear from Fuzzy or someone on how to do the data dump from the available on Fuzzy's number.  Hopefully I'll hear this from Harvey. 

Regarding Marko Rodin.  I'm satisfied he's definitely discovered a number sequence.  Personally I'm not that interested.  But I'm hooked on his friend - Jamie Buturff.  I keep trying to find an email address that may actually reach him.  Many, many such have been sent out.  But I've not yet struck gold.  Can you help here?  You've got certain skills on the search engine?  And I'll ignore your criticisms about him.  He's OK in my book.

That 'hole' is very possibly a monopole.  I would not expect it to interest you.  It's way too promising and definitely only catnip to us 'free energy' eccentrics. 

Oh MileHigh.  So glad you're not your common run of the mill typical troll.  You just mess with the mood - not the mind.  And I've been awake for a few hours now - so I can take it on the chin.  Still your biggest fan.

With love from
Rosie   

I WISH STEFAN WOULD GIVE US MORE EMOTICONS!!!!!

[Rosemary Ainslie]

MileHigh - I really need to answer your post in more detail - lest everyone gets the wrong impression here.

I think that - in truth - you're simply a frustrated teacher.  You don't think you perhaps missed your vocation?  Regarding the data dump number and analysis.  We're all pretty good at this.  Surprisingly.  There's not much I can't do with data provided I've got a calculator.  Without it I can do nothing.  And exel is simply a really fine calculator.  But thank you anyway for the 'step by step'.

Regarding Fuzzy's tests and data and general approach to testing - you really need to take stock here.  You're sitting in the relative comfort of your armchair liberally bestowing your unwanted advice to all and sundry.  What you're not doing is getting familiar with the hands on requirements of complex data capture - careful observation of results - careful recording of such - and the final disciplines required to relay the facts without any interpretive distortion.  That, in my book, is the perfect experimentalist.  But notwithstanding the arduous and taxing exactitudes required to do this properly - is the compounded stress of having to master and use a complex instrument to best advantage in as short a space of time as is humanly possible.  Fortunately Fuzzy is no intellectual lightweight and is well equal to the task.  But if I were him I'd be more than a little irritated at having to comply to your requirements and unsolicited advices when his primary object here is to master all aspects of this as quickly as possible while applying his own criteria to determine his own questions rather than yours.  And while I get it that you are compulsively unable to withhold this flow of guidance - perhaps, for a week, you could just hold back and 'watch the lights' as you keep promising to do but never seem to quite manage.

I have not discussed this - and I apologise to Fuzzy if I've got this wrong.  Perhaps I'm overly concermed and where no harm was intended - none was felt.  But if I were to put myself in his shoes I would probably want to bite you.  Comment on the data.  Analyse the waveforms.  Draw conclusions.  All such welcome.  Just don't try and control the testing as well, unless you first want to set us an example as to how this is done.  We've got Harvey to guide us.  It's all we need.

When it comes to a discussion of Marko Rodin or Jamie Buturff - that's different.  I personally think they're both really brave.  The more so as your reaction to their intersts and findings is typical of mainstream and mainstream are still the majorty.  Which puts them in a minorty against the masses.  That's usually where the winds of change start blowing.  Anyway - that's my tuppence worth.  I don't expect too much will come from this post but I can, at least, try.

Rosie 

(edit:  Included my signature which I nearly overlooked - God forbid)

[PaulLowrance]

I'm a big believer in "free energy" research, but IMO the "Rosemary Ainslie" case is a fake. Contact me for details.