Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

Started by TinselKoala, June 16, 2009, 09:52:52 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 23 Guests are viewing this topic.

Rosemary Ainslie

OK  - MileHigh.  Here's the thing.  Fuzzy has a glass base.  All that's needed is to plug both ends and the resistor will have no 'wafting' air currents.  I'm sure he's attended to this.  That way - its position is largly immaterial.  Your chimney introduces too many variables.  But I agree that it's better to keep it off surfaces.  Your point here is taken.

And I tend to agree with Ash - on all things.

MileHigh

Fuzzy:

It is just applied knowledge, simple as that.  There is nothing to reference.  I wouldn't be supprised if Poynt would graciously "open source" the setup - Gotoluc has one of his own already.

Rosemary:

Just about any resistor setup is valid as long as you keep it thermally isolated from the rest of the environment.  If both ends of the tube are blocked then your recorded temperatures will be higher.  That does not matter, blocked or unblocked holes can generate valid data sets.

All that you want is for the thermal resistance to remain stable for any setup, and to keep your thermal capacitance constant.

Anyway, I am happy that you are happy about Glen's testing and his replication.  You may recall that two months ago I was arguing that this was the way to go.

MileHigh

Rosemary Ainslie

 ;D  Hi MileHigh.  No I don't recall you arguing this.  But my memory is not what it was.  I sort of remember a suggestion to hang the resistor vertically in the air?  Was I dreaming? 

edit  - sorry I misread you here.  Yes I do remember you asking for a full replication.  But why does this not also delight you MileHigh?  I cannot tell you how disappointed I am.  I thought you'd be over the moon. 

MileHigh

Ha ha!  Don't be coy now, you know I was talking about running the standard test - the real 3% (or greater) duty cycle setup witout going crazy with the oscillations first.

MileHigh

Ok I will reply here to conserve the "Internet trees."  (lousy joke but at least no singing)  Yes I am happy that Glen did a straight replication, absolutely.  More interesting buzz has been generated in the past week than the previous six weeks.


Rosemary Ainslie

MileHigh - in case you missed this.

edit  - sorry I misread you here.  Yes I do remember you asking for a full replication.  But why does this not also delight you MileHigh?  I cannot tell you how disappointed I am.  I thought you'd be over the moon.  (from 1977)

;D Rosie