Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[WilbyInebriated]

I'll post my present results (despite the glaring inconsistencies) after I see someone respond with a summary as I requested above in post # 2037.

...unless I come up with an explanation prior to.

.99

refusing to allow your data and experimental setup to undergo immediate open peer review unless your irrelevant condition is met, is likely to be regarded with suspicion by scholars and professionals...

[Rosemary Ainslie]

refusing to allow your data and experimental setup to undergo immediate open peer review unless your irrelevant condition is met, is likely to be regarded with suspicion by scholars and professionals...

Hello Willby. Just so nice to see you back.    You will note I was allowed admission to this side of things after TK's belated departure.  I think he needed a monologue which I was obliged to provide but you weren't.

Have some mercy on our poor Fuzzy the Inimitable.  Do you know how long it takes to collate and present data?  Each post takes upwards of three hours.  And I suspect that we're the happy recipients of a large chapter of his life here.  Perhaps he's telling us that he wants to see some reciprocity of effort before he tackles a new submission?   Personally I'm delighted to see we'll still be getting more.  Thanks for this FuzzyTomCat.  Much appreciated.

And MileHigh - my other favourite troll - I'm so, so sorry I got shirty.  Make allowances.  I'm really, really old and way too crabby.  We need you to work through some of Fuzzy's data - if you're up for it.  Relying on that partiality which invariably puts mainstream logic into full critical focus.   

[poynt99]

Rose,

I don't think MH is up to it. I already offered him my data and he graciously passed. Besides, I already crunched Fuzzy's data.

In regards to Fuzzy, I am not asking him for a new data run if that is what you meant.

I provided reference to the data run already posted some time ago, namely the "2_40us_520V-01_10_08_09.xlr" set.

All that I am asking for (if it hasn't been done already) is for someone to post the calculations in a quick summary post as I suggested. Surely this has already been done

I have my numbers for Fuzzy's data run (and I have already posted most of them), and I would like to see someone else's computation of the same power dissipations I listed in that post.

I am putting in my fair share of time, rest assured. I used almost my entire long weekend (last weekend) and I took an additional day off from work (without pay of course) strictly to work on this, not to mention all evening of every day this week. What was I doing last night and all of today (and still going)? You guessed right if you said working on this. My laptop is here right on my bench.

Still waiting for a reply/summary.

Meanwhile, I think I may have had a breakthrough to explain the negative MOSFET power, and most likely other apparent net energy gains.

.99

[poynt99]

Which other data set of Glen's would you like looked at Rose?

I have done several data dumps (so yes I know how long these take, esp. when saving to old 3.5" floppy), and also have a good spreadsheet going. I may also mention that I am using 5 times the number of samples for my tests (that's right, 50,000 samples) as Glen, so it is taking even longer to dump the data.

Let me know which specific file you want crunched. Why is no one over there doing these?

.99

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Hi Poynt.  I'm knee deep here.  I'll get back if I may.