Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[WilbyInebriated]

Doing this exercise in SPICE is a worthless, time-wasting effort imo. Not to mention the fact that aside from adding in a small inductance for the shunt resistor, it is somewhat complicated. ?

.99

i tried to tell you that a long time ago, i guess you weren't in the grappling mood back then that you are now
is this where i give myself some brownie points like MH always does?

i should go back and drag up all the inane suggestions tk, you, MH and the rest of the crew came up with along the way. i recall both of you telling rose et al. what the definitive test was 100 pages ago, and how easy it would be to do...
it might be fun and enlightening to go back over some of those posts.

[powercat]

Hmmmm is this the beginning off the end of this thread
we have seen it all before, when extensive testing by reputable and experienced members
shows poor efficiency of a device, the thread will slowly fade away.

unless the testing gives a positive new direction

cat

[Hoppy]

Hmmmm is this the beginning off the end of this thread
we have seen it all before, when extensive testing by reputable and experienced members
shows poor efficiency of a device, the thread will slowly fade away.

unless the testing gives a positive new direction

cat

I fear that is the case cat. Neither of Rosemary's team 'experts' Fuzzy and Harvey are able to say with any conviction that her circuit is running OU let alone COP17. However, so far it has been far from a wasted exercise and has highlighted how difficult it is to accurately quantify power and energy levels in reactive circuits producing complex waveforms. I think we have all learnt from this thread.

Hoppy

[allcanadian]

@PaulLowrance

Over time the "free energy" community will be forced to deal with those who continually make fake claims year after year under different names to waste a lot of legit researcher time.

I wonder who would judge these claims and what qualifications they would have to make this judgement?. Nobody here or elsewhere I know of can seem to tell me what electricity, magnetism and gravity are fundamentally --- the three primary forces, so who is qualified to judge anything or anyone?
If you look at history you will find most of the Nobel prize winners were told they were consuming valuable resources and time which could be better spent, LOL, everybody has an opinion but few have all the facts.

@powercat

Hmmmm is this the beginning off the end of this thread
we have seen it all before, when extensive testing by reputable and experienced members shows poor efficiency of a device, the thread will slowly fade away.
unless the testing gives a positive new direction

I would ask the same question as above, reputable and experienced in what exactly?---- building OU machines? If they have yet to build an OU machine or at least seen the effect even once then they are neither experienced nor have knowledge of anything that matters. The only person to have shown any new insight in any way recently in my opinion has been Milehigh in post #2141, but he has only scratched the surface. He and others have assumed the capacitance is distributed but he essentially stated why it cannot be in his post.
AC

[powercat]

Hoppy
I agree if nothing else there has been some wonderful research done   and hopefully more to come.

Allcanadian
I'm sorry I don't remember seeing your postings in this thread, are you saying that you are seeing something here that others have missed...    I hope so

I believe the work I have seen so far on testing this circuit has been thorough and professional,
anyway we are all entitled to our opinions

cat

Allcanadian, sorry, I look back through the previous post and have now seen your postings